This site has been moved to it’s new site at:  https://www.arationallookatvaccines.com/

   Contents

  A. Intoduction

  B. Data to get you Thinking

  C. Vaccine Science is not settled

  D. Are Vaccines Our Greatest Achievement?

  E. Your Doctor is a “Victim of his Training”

  F.  Mandatory Vaccination

  G. Industry Funded Science

  H.  Downsides to Vaccines (side effects)

  I .  Alternate Vaccine Schedules

  J.  Can you trust the CDC and HC

       Fantastic Appendix

 A. INTRODUCTION

       ABBREVIATIONS USED

NACI= National Advisory Committee on Immunization, in Canada, with Health Canada(NACI and ACIP are the people who decide what vaccines your child gets.)

ACIP=  Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice, in the US, with the CDC

AMA =American Medical Ass.
 AAP=American Academy of Pediatricians
CPS= Canadian Pediatric Society

CDC= When I say CDC, I am referring to the 'US'  Centre for Disease Control
HC= Health Canada
VICP= Vaccine Injury Compensation Program in the US.

Vaccines have helped rid us of infectious diseases. Polio, smallpox, diphtheria, all gone.  But at what cost?  Why would you think we get a "free ride" with vaccination?  We don’t with any other medical intervention.

“Vaccines are our greatest achievement”.  “Vaccines have damaged a generation of children”.  What's the truth?
 It is somewhere in the middle.  It is not a black and white, all or nothing issue, like the so many make out.

    You see so-called, Anti-vaxers saying "vaccines don't work, there all poison, there for depopulation, don't take any vaccines.
    And the other extreme, "get all your vaccines on time they are totally safe" and websites over the top in defending them. The fact they can find no fault with vaccines should make you suspicious of them.
 
    There is no rational thinking going on on either side.
 I believe the truth is somewhere in the middle, the hard part is figuring out exactly where in the middle the truth lies.  That is what I am trying to do here.

I am going to look at:
      Mandatory vaccination.
      Are there too many vaccines now?
      Should we be getting them one at time, delaying 'some' and skipping others.
      And the biggy, try to nail down exactly how dangerous are vaccines. 

Have we exchanged infectious diseases for chronic diseases? Vaccines do save lives and have helped rid us of infectious diseases, but are they causing chronic disease?  A two month old infant gets 5 shots in one go. Can they 'all' handle that?

Vaccines are by their very nature risky, that's why there is so much controversy over them.  This supreme court document says "vaccines are a unavoidably unsafe product".
-https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/09-152.ZD.html?fbclid=IwAR3XtC4hsetg3Gn0gT4Lg9yNpgUw6h3EjOwtWcG38QIKiKZJOdi3VekmHjQ  Do a word search, says 5 times "vaccines unavoidably unsafe".

16% of parents now ask for alternate vaccine schedules.  That is what I want to help promote.  The delaying of some vaccines, getting them one at a time, and skipping some.  How bad are the side effects? Are there too many vaccines? 
#1..https://www.aap.org/en-us/professional-resources/Research/pediatrician-surveys/pages/vaccine-refusals.aspx  Under Results says  87% of pediatricians  now say they have had a parent refuse some vaccines,  and paediatricians  report 14% of parents refused one or more vaccines. Then says in 2013 16% of parents asked for a alternate vaccine schedule for one or more vaccines, like delaying some and getting them one at a time.(See link #5 as well)

 Most infectious diseases would not even be a big problem any more,(chart 1) we have cleaned up our act, streets are not running with sewage, we know how to control outbreaks, and we have great medical knowledge.  (Section i talks about skipping some vaccine)

 Measles is now the only real problem infectious disease now. We are also getting many whooping cough(pertussis) outbreaks now and most of those are in fully vaccinated people, but this is a vaccine problem, it is no longer working properly, science on this in appendix.

The US has more vaccines on kids schedule than any other country and Canada is close behind.  In Canada or the US, you dare to suggest "do we really need the Rotavirus vaccine, the Hep A(US only), or Chicken Pox vaccine," you are flayed alive by a shocked commentary.

   Wait a minute!! Sweden and a number of European countries do not even have these vaccines on the kids schedule and they are doing fine, actually better than us.  So why are you so upset at me for talking about it.  This all shows how everyone has been brain washed and logical thought is gone.

-This is what I want to promote in this website.  It is time to change the kids vaccination schedule.  We should aim for as few as possible until kid is over 2 years old, and get rid of mandatory vaccination. 

   It should be a parents choice to fully, partially, delay or skip  vaccination.
       What about "Herd immunity" you say, see section E in appendix.

We can safely delay "some" vaccines now. Not all of them. Others we can totally skip or leave until they are in there teens or an adult and they can make their own choices.(Section i has more detail and links)  Vaccines should also be given one at a time, at least a month apart.

    The fact is, the top officials know this, but say it is "too inconvenient" to do them one at a time, and parents won't come back every month and some will be missed.  The officials will quote dogma like: There is no evidence that getting 5 vaccines at once is any more dangerous than 1 at a time."   That defies common sense. 

The CDC and HC are still stuck in the past, have a one size fits all mentality and are under constant pressure from the Industry.  This is 2018, not 1910. 

How safe are vaccines?  The CDC and HC, Health Canada, like to make out there is a one in a million chance of a serious adverse event from a vaccine, and that is what your doctor is taught.  If this were true, none of this would matter, but its not true!!  There is no data to support that.
  See next two links below, I will have much more on this in Section H.  

#2.http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/no-fault-compensation-urged-for-those-injured-by-vaccines/article622341/  Bottom of this article says: “Canadian Paediatric Society- CPS, estimates that of the 400,000 children immunized each year in Canada, 5 will suffer a permanent injury. So that is 1 in 80,000 will have a Permanent injury.  I have much more in section H, and will show 1 in 80,000 is way too low. 

 The flip side to this is that if you do not get a measles vaccine for example, and get measles, there is 1 chance in 3000 of dying of measles.  But, flip it again, what is the chance of your kid getting measles today if you delay this vaccine two years? Almost zero.  
By the way, measles is not a death sentence, we all use to get measles, very few got serious complications.

DELAYING VACCINES.

   Now that the vaccines have rid us of measles it is now safe to delay this vaccine for 2 years, which is much safer for the kid. If you live in a area that is having a rare outbreak of measles, then don't delay it.  Lets get away from this one size fits all mentality of the CDC.

 There is more to this, new research is coming out now showing potential long term problems with vaccines, especially with some of the "live vaccines like the mmr" and the aluminum containing vaccines.  There is no tracking of long term problems in kids. 
   As above link showed, if there is a minimum of 1 80,000 kids permanently injured by vaccines, it would seem logical that there would also be long term issues as well. See section H for more on this and the Appendix.
   Another example of a vaccine you can delay, is the Polio vaccine.  It can be safely delayed or even skipped altogether.
The current US schedule give’s the polio vaccine at 2 and 4 months old. Your kid is NOT going to get polio if you delay the shot 3 years.  Because thanks,in part, to vaccines, polio has disappeared in North America.   

   Link #89 below, "the Polio Eradication Program", shows there is now only 3 countries with a handful of polio cases, Nigeria ,Afganistan and Pakistan and these cases are under control, so, no, polio is not, only a plane ride away.
The risk from the vaccine on a 2 month old is now much greater than the risk of polio today. “All choices have risk”.  

This study is another eye opener.  
#2a. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174753  This Canadian study, which 11 doctors signed, says "1 in 168 kids vaccinated at their 12 month doctor visit for the MMR vaccine will end up in the emergency room,"   
   There are many more studies like this, I have more in section H and more in the appendix.

All the adverse events, or side effects talked about so far are the immediate ones, ones that show up in the first weeks after immunization. These are the only one's monitored.  Read the important link# 25 below from the CDC.  It gives you a whole new look at adverse events. 
     The adverse events that happen in the first month are all that are studied. There is almost no studies on long term or chronic problems from vaccines. Must read is Link #25, it shows there could be over 50 long term health problems caused by vaccines, and the CDC at this links says "there is no or inadequate research to form a conclusion."  Up to 50% of kids now have at least one chronic health problem(Link #'s 10,11,12,13.)
     Do you honestly believe that giving a 2 month old infant 4 or 5 vaccines in one go, is safe?   Hep B vaccine, Rotavirus, DtaP, Hib, PCV13 and Polio are on th US schedule for the tiny 2 month infant.  Three of those vaccines have the neuro-toxin, aluminum, along with other nasty stuff.(Link #8 for list of ingredients)
    As I said above, we may have exchanged infectious diseases for chronic diseases.  I think we can find a compromise somewhere in the middle.  All choices haver risk, we must find the balance.
      

 You don't hear about vaccine injuries because it is considered not in the public interest to report them. "protect the vaccination program at all costs". You may read one story a year in the media.(See link #71h)  And injuries are poorly tracked.(Links 16 & 17)
Goto "YouTube", type in "Vaccine Injured child", you get thousands of sad stories.

     I will show there is some risk from vaccines.  The disease was more dangerous than the vaccine, but thanks, in part, to vaccines infectious disease is now 99.9% gone, so now the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease and it is now time to minimize the side effects as well.  There is lots we can do.

    No the ACIP and NACI, the people who decide what vaccines we get, are not doing a good job for us. The ACIP has been under investigation for conflicts of interest over and over, they are out of touch.  Facts and links at section J. 

     NACI’s twelve members are staffed with industry heavy weights, fully vested in vaccines.

#3-https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/national-advisory-committee-on-immunization-naci/naci-membership-representation.html
 Read the bio’s here on each of the members of NACI.  One is a pharmacy rep, another is a rep for the trade organization CPS, the Canadian Petdiatric Society.  Not one of these career experts would dare say a negative thing about vaccines.   There is no one there to represent your kid.

ACIP and NACI, US and Canada immunization advisory groups, both say there is only one safe vaccine schedule to follow.  How can that be true!  Canada and US schedules have many differences.  The same with European countries there are many schedules.  So how can they say there is only one safe schedule?(see comments at link #14a below) Many wealthy European countries have many less vaccines on their schedule than the US and are healthier.

    I know some countries have different issues, but these are minor.  Is all of Canada so different from the US?  The US has many different regions, yet the kids all get the same vaccine schedule. 

Are we suppose to follow everything the ACIP or NACI tells us, without question?  Because that’s the narrative out there.   Since when do they get a free pass?  We question everything else the government tells us, and with good reason. 

WATCH THIS VIDEO.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt-CZN48rR8 Watch this excellent video. If you only have 50 minutes, and not time to go thru my site, this video is a great primer.  This is done by so-called anti-vaxer people, but the facts are the facts. You can verify them yourself.
    This video talks a lot about the  IOM government CDC reports, I have read them myself and what he says is true.(see my link #25 below) There are over 50 disease that may be caused by vaccines and there is not enough science to say whether vaccines are causing them or not, and the science is still not being done.(the science is not settled is it) There are a few small exaggerations and mistakes I caught in this video, but they are minor. This is a hugely complicated subject and mistakes are made, I know I make them all the time. 

Notice that everything I say in this post is backed up with good sources, like the CDC,  Health Canada, Scientific studies and major news sources. No anti-vax sites(except 2).

Note:  I am still editing this site, so stuff missing and errors still. I threw all my thoughts and science here and am now cleaning it up and adding and subtracting. 
    This is a complicated subject and even the experts often disagree.

      B.        INTERESTING DATA TO GET YOU THINKING.

A myth promoted by doctors,the CDC, and the media is that us lay-people who do our own research are all being mis-lead by anti-vax sites, Jenny McCarthy and other celebrities.  Totally wrong.  Have you seen me quoting celebrities?  Or seen any anti-vax sites linked here?  Note that I do link to several in the appendix, but I say when I do.

   I look at science and mainstream news articles that quote experts.

    Interestingly, the only people who seem to refer to Celebrities are the mainstream media and a few ignorant rabid pro-vaxers.

Let me give my position on vaccines. If hardcore pro-vaxers are a 10 and a total anti-vaxer 0, I would be about a 7 or similar to link #5 here. (edit, further research has moved me to a 6)

And don't criticize unless you have done at least a few hundred hours of your own research, please.

#5.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/128/5/848?download=true  This study in Pediatrics shows that 13% of parents now follow an alternate vaccine schedule, like delaying some vaccines 2 or 3 years and getting them one at a time.  This also shows 51% skip some vaccines.  This study was 2011, how much higher is it now?  This is not a few crazy people, 13% is a large number.
Link #1 above shows it is 16% in 2013.

 Studies show these people are the more highly educated parents. If it is the more highly educated that are worried about vaccines, then how come you assume they are stupid to question vaccines? You can’t have it both ways.
Maybe it's you that is wrong?
    Remember, I am not saying not to vaccinate, just to change schedule and get rid of mandatory vaccination.

  The CDC says vaccines are rigorously tested for many years before they goto market. Well sort off.  They are tested for 10 years or so, but guess who is doing the designing and testing. Merck or GSK or whoever is making the vaccine. It is the fox who does the 10 years of testing. They can hide bad data, massage data, get everything just the way they need to. The next step is to present their massaged data to the FDA.  We know the record of the FDA, Vioxx anyone.  

    The FDA does monitor part of the process, but how well??   See next link for the process. At the end, it is the manufacture rep that gives the final presentation to the ACIP working committee. CDC also says it then does adverse event tracking with VAERS. Well we known that has 99% under reporting.(see Link #16 below)

#6.  https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/basics/test-approve.html

  Witness the HPV vaccine debacle. Hiding of data, not doing adverse event testing properly and more.  See  this.
  https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3/detailed-comment/en?messageId=156963219  This vaccine is getting a rough ride around the world. 

-When we first started making vaccines we did not have a clue what we were doing.  We just saw that they kinda worked and ran with it.  Anything to stop our kids dying of Diphtheria and measles etc.
 #7.

#8.http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf  This is the list of ingredients for each vaccine. Look at this list!!  We have been lulled into thinking these are safe.  This is a frighting list, of course some kids are going to suffer serious consequences.

How comfortable should we be injecting, not ingesting, these compounds into a 2 month old infant?  Not once or twice, but 17 times with 9 vaccines by the time the kid is 6 months old(US schedule).  And almost double that by the time he is 6 years old.  Turn your common sense on, do you truly believe this is totally safe for a 2 month infant??
    You hear the media say "there is tons of science saying vaccines are safe", not true, see link #25 for starters. 

Sample of some ingredients.

Aluminum, Kanamycin, Neomycin, cetylrimethlyammonium bromide, MRC-5 cell line from lung tissue of 14 week old aborted human fetus(human DNA), Vero cells which are a cell line from African green monkey kidney(possible retro-viruses) and calf serum, to name a few. 

 (If your shocked and don't believe me, Google "MRC-5 cell line Wiki", or Vero cells.)

You may say, "well the amount of the above toxins injected is very small."

Think about this. Parents who have kids with peanut or nut allergies, know that even just a few molecules of a nut can send your child into a anaphylactic attack and even kill him.  The tiniest quantities of toxins can be deadly.
Lets look at the facts. Here is US kids schedule.
  -https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html
All the vaccines are a .5ml dose.(Google 'package insert' for each)  So if 2 month old infant gets his 5 shots per schedule, that is 2.5 ml.  That is half a teaspoon full of toxins.  A teaspoon is 5ml.  And add the Rotavirus vaccine, it is oral, not injected. This is a 2ml dose, so kid gets 2.5ml of 5 vaccines injected and 2ml orally all in one go. That is not a small amount for a 2 month old infant.

-Here is a great analogy.  You eat applesauce, it is great.  But suppose I put 20ml in a syringe and tried to inject you with it. You would be horrified.  But you are happy injecting 20ml of stuff far more toxic than apple sauce in your tiny infant. This shows how we have been conditioned.  You say, "well they have been tested" Huh, go read link #25 from the CDC and 64a,64b, please. And remember who does the testing, the manufacture of the vaccine.

                                                                     1930’s Time Magazine ad

     43% of kids now have a chronic health condition.

#10.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21570014 This says in 2011, 43% of US kids have at least 1 in 20 chronic health conditions.  This study is not interested in why, just if they have insurance.

#11. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160430100357.htm Children with chronic conditions on the rise.

#12.https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/developmentaldisabilities/features/birthdefects-dd-keyfindings.html  This says as of 2008, 1 in 6 kids have a developmental disability.  Increased to 17.1% from 1997 to 2008. That’s 10 years ago.  what is it now?  Vaccines have been proven to cause brain damage(links 55,65), how often. 

#13.http://mynorthwest.com/405172/kids-and-food-allergies/  This says there has been a 50% increase in food allergies in the last 15 year. Then comes up with some wild guesses that might be causing it.

#14.https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-are-asthma-rates-soaring/  This asks “why are asthma rates soaring”? This is true even in many poor countries. Studies now link vaccines to allergies and asthma.(Appendix DTaP)

-The ACIP likes to say there is only one safe vaccine schedule.  Total nonsense!  Lets look at Sweden for example.
Sweden, one of the healthiest nations has four less vaccines on kids schedule than the US. Sweden has no Hep A, no Rotavirus, no chicken pox,  and no flu shot.  They delay the Hep B shot until kid is 3 months old rather than at birth like the US does. And they delay the mmr to 18 months rather than 12 months.
   They are doing fine, unlike the US with the unhealthiest kids anywhere.
#14a. https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu European country schedules.  So when the ACIP says "following their schedule is the only safe choice", I say nonsense.   The United Kingdom does not vaccinate for chicken pox and Hep A either, and only recommend the flu shot for young kids and the elderly, while the US and Canada push the flu shot on everyone over 6 months old.

#16.https://healthit.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf  See Page 6. This HHS(US dept of Health and Human Services.) funded study, says “fewer than 1% of Vaccine Adverse events are reported in the U.S.” 

     Less than 1% get reported!!  So how do they know how many side effects there are from vaccines, how do they know they are safe?

 An automatic reporting system was tried and worked in some hospitals, but the CDC did not want to implement it for no good reason, so it was canceled.(Page 6 of this link)
#16a.https://healthit.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/electronic-support-public-health-vaccine-adverse-event-reporting-system  This also says less than 1% of adverse events get reported. (Easier read) Note that VAERS is run by both the FDA and CDC together.

#17.http://globalnews.ca/news/3674979/dangerous-medicine-prescription-drugs-vanessas-law-health-canada-gutting/  This shows that 96% of serious adverse events do not get reported in Canada. 

#17a. -https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/04/opinion/sunday/anti-vaccine-activists-have-taken-vaccine-science-hostage.html     The journalist who wrote this article, says, “When I tried to report on unexpected or controversial aspects of vaccine efficacy or safety, scientists often didn’t want to talk to me. When I get them on the phone, they are so terrified of the publics vaccine hesitancy that they are censoring themselves, playing down negative findings and even avoiding doing studies that could show unwanted effects. Those who break these unwritten rules are criticized.”

  This article is about how scientists get into trouble if they publish anything negative about vaccines. For example Skowronski’s data on "repeat flu shot problem" was fought and went through 8 reviews before Plos journal finally published it.(If it was positive findings it would have been published instantly I am sure).
   This is a good article, but the title is hilarious. Who are these scientists really afraid of? Some parents who are anti-vaxers or the might of the pharmacy industry coming after them and Wakefielding them.

    VACCINES ARE NOW BIG MONEY!

     I hear over and over "pharma does not make any money off vaccines".  Absolute nonsense!   Yes that was true 20 plus years ago, now vaccines are blockbuster money makers.

 It can cost anywhere from 300 million to 1.5 Billion to bring a new vaccine to market, that can be recouped in 6 months. 

    As you go through the links below, you will see that vaccines are now among pharma's top moneymakers now.  Phizer says the pneumococcus vaccine is it's biggest money maker now, making 6.2 $billion last year.(at $115 a shot and costs 2 or 3 dollars to make.

    See link #20 for vaccine price list. Several of the newer vaccines are well over $100 a shot and they only cost 1 to $4 to produce. 

    You may say "so what pharma has a right to make a profit". True, but this is to show these are 'massive' profits.  How many industries make over 50% profit? Vaccines are 200% to 1000% profit.  This shows they will say and do anything to maintain these profits. Billions are at stake. They have the money to buy your legislators, CDC and the media. They spend more money lobbying than any other industry.

#18.https://www.salon.com/2016/02/11/pharmaceutical_corporations_rake_in_billions_on_pneumonia_vaccines_while_millions_in_poor_countries_go_without/ 

    Today, it costs 68 times more to fully immunize a child than it did in 2001.  GSK has made $30 Billion since 2009 on the pneumococcal vaccine alone.($130 a child) 

#19.https://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/health/conditions/how-vaccines-became-big-business/article572731/  This 2009 article says. flu shot costs $1 to make and has gone from $2 dollars a shot to $8(now $18) a shot, a healthy profit.  Shows how vaccines have become big business and prices and rises fast. Vaccines have gone from money losers 20 years ago and are now big money and have become top money makers for the few vaccine makers left. 

19a.https://investors.merck.com/news/press-release-details/2018/Merck-Announces-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2017-Financial-Results/default.aspx  This 2018 report shows that 2 vaccines, Gardasil and pneumovax 23, are number 3 and 8 for top money making products for Merck.

19b-https://www.statista.com/statistics/265102/revenues-in-the-global-vaccine-market/ This shows the Global vaccine market has gone from 32 $Billion in 2014 to 49 Billion in 2018 and expected to be 60 $billion in 2020.   Don’t tell me vaccines are not profitable!

19c. https://www.ft.com/content/93374f4a-e538-11e5-a09b-1f8b0d268c39  The Financial Times says "Vaccines are among pharma's biggest selling products. 

Phizer says the pneumonia, meningitis pneumococcus vaccine is it’s biggest money maker now, making $6.2 Billion last year at $115 a shot, and costs only a few dollars to make.  Also see link #49.

#20.https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/awardees/vaccine-management/price-list/index.html  Here is the price list for today’s vaccines. Chicken pox or Varicella vaccine $110,  HPV vaccine $160, Rotavirus vaccine $115, pneumococcal vaccine $130.

How can something be a money loser that cost $4.00 to make and sells for $120, 


This is worrisome. 

#21.http://articles.latimes.com/2005/feb/08/business/fi-vaccine8 A memo shows Merck officials were worried about excess mercury levels in vaccines way back in 1991. It was not until 2001 that they were told by government to stop using mercury in most vaccines.  It was not removed voluntarily.  You get people trying to say thimerosal is ok not like methyl mercury. Nonsense. Ethyl mercury is also a neuro-toxin as this memo says. Ethyl mercury is 50% mercury.  It is still in half the flu shots. shots. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thiomersal Under "toxicology," says thimerosal is very toxic and can accumulate in body.
    You can show me lots of studies that say thimerosal is safe. But there all tobacco science. It's mercury!! Its not safe in any amount, whether it is Ehtyl or methyl mercury!  Use your common sense!

#22.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/doctors-sound-the-alarm-on-possible-harms-of-saline-in-iv-bags/  Says changing IV solution type will save 1 in a 100 patients. So will save over 50,000 lives a year, this is huge! This is scary, but it got very little coverage in the media.  Industry is always protected. 
Then a doctor says they have been saying this for 20 years. "It is pure inertia  that prevents change".  This is the same with vaccines, we have rid us of diseases and now we are long overdue for change. 
   

-Parents need their kids vaccinated to attend public school, we can’t be telling them not vaccinate. Options need to be presented to them, and give them science to show to their indoctrinated doctors.  We also need to get rid of Mandatory vaccination.
Goto Google and scan through news stories on vaccines. You will rarely see anything intelligent printed about vaccines, just the standard cliches. "Vaccines are safe and effective", "The science is settled, you are crazy if you talk about vaccines".  Or vaccines do not cause autism and they completely ignore all the autoimmune diseases and neuro-logical disease caused by vaccines.(Read section C next)
     Media quotes are always from doctors who are usually paid industry spokesmen, or CDC spokesmen and paid to push vaccines.  I don't think much will change until we get a new generation of doctors. Mean while thanks to the internet, good vaccine information is finally being spread.(Along with much nonsense.) 

        C.      VACCINE SCIENCE IS SETTLED (NOT)

If you think the experts know whats going on in our bodies when a vaccine is injected, I have news for you.

   

    “The science is settled”.  "The science has been done". “Vaccines are safe and effective”,  “There is nothing more to talk about”.  This dogma is everywhere.   These statements are designed to stop all discussion.  They are not true!
 Many times I have heard "Ya gotta look at the science man" in response to a remark on vaccine.  I then ask, "so how many hours have you looked?" I get silence- zero hours, they are quoting dogma heard over and over.  If you find yourself saying the above comments, you have been “got to”. That is the narrative being pushed by Industry and mainstream media.

The statement, "the science is settled", is anti-science. 

Have you ever heard of science being settled on anything medical, or anything for that matter?  .  The Industry and CDC do not want you looking into it. “You must get all your vaccines”.
   The only people questioning vaccines are the one's who have actually looked at the science, or have a vaccine injured kid.

   #24.http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/how-do-vaccines-work-ubc-scientists-aim-to-find-out  This article discusses “how scientists around the world are now going to figure out how vaccines really work.”. Says that in 2017 we still only have basic understanding of how vaccines work. Quote: “Vaccines are very difficult thing to study because there are reactions taking place all over the body”  then says “most of what happens is a ‘black box’.”  So how can we say the “science is settled?  I will repeat that, “Most of what happens is a black box”.  We have no idea what long term damage is being done by vaccines. 

- If you think the science is settled on vaccines, read this direct from the CDC itself. Also shows how poor the science behind vaccines is.
#25. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/history/index.html  This web page has the usual dogma, but does say one important thing. This here is cut and pasted from this CDC web page:

• "The NCVIA established a committee from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review the literature on vaccine reactions. This group concluded that there are limitations in our knowledge of the risks associated with vaccines. The group looked at 76 health problems to see if they were caused by vaccines. Of those, 50 (66%) had no or inadequate research to form a conclusion. Specifically, the IOM identified the following problems:
1. Limited understanding of biological processes that underlie adverse events.
2. Incomplete and inconsistent information from individual reports.
3. Poorly constructed research studies (not enough people enrolled for the period of time).
4. Inadequate systems to track vaccine side effects.
5. Few experimental studies were published in the medical literature"                                                      

The above is saying there is fifty health problems that they do not know if vaccines are causing them or not!!  And there is no or inadequate research to form a conclusion!!!  This is 2018, when is the research going to be done? Is the answer they won't because the industry does not want to know or they already suspect the truth.(I thought the science was in and settled, guess not.)
       It is also not being being done because there is no money in it and if you do it, you are labeled a anti-vaxer, and a smear campaign is initiated by pharma. There is some research being done though, and their findings are disturbing, see appendix.
For the full IOM report, goto appendix section D to find out how to download it. 

#26.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/26/health/study-finds-vaccinated-baboons-can-still-carry-whooping-cough.html?_r=0  Lets look at the DTP vaccine. They changed the DTP to the DTaP in in the 1990’s because of side effects.( That should read too many serious side effects.  The vaccine was causing more problems than the disease).  The new DTaP has less side effects but works poorly, and is almost ineffective after a few years.
Read link #25 above and notice section on the National child vaccine injury program or VICP Vaccine Injury Compensation program.  This gives a soft sell of what really happened with the DTP vaccine and lawsuits.
    See the DTaP section in Appendix below. The pertussis virus is changing and the vaccine is not really working any more, hence all the outbreaks.  They say we need a new vaccine but nobody is working on it.  Pharma won't bother, because it is now mandatory for everyone to get it. So it will take government or CDC action to get this going. What are they waiting for??
    The pertussis vaccine should be separated out on its own I believe, so the kid can get the diphtheria vaccine and tetanus a few year later, we need to minimize the number of vaccines a kid under two years old gets.

#28.https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/scienceresearch/biologicsresearchareas/ucm127315.htm  Read this recent article from the FDA. Quote: “The present lack of knowledge in areas of mumps vaccine safety and efficacy is highlighted by the licensure of some mumps vaccines that have caused Aseptic Meningitis”.  Quote: “Problems with vaccine safety can be linked to an inadequate understanding of the infectious process”. Article says over and over how little they understand of how the live virus vaccine like mumps in the MMR works.  This is 2017!!

    The current mumps vaccine barely works, we are now getting many mumps outbreaks in the fully vaccinated. The article also says “new live mumps vaccines are coming and they do not know how to test if there safe and effective”. Does this sound like vaccine science is settled? It's also scary.

#29.https://www.bu.edu/sph/2017/09/21/resurgence-of-whooping-cough-may-owe-to-vaccines-inability-to-prevent-infections/  This also shows we have never really understood how the DTP vaccine works.  Quote: “This disease is back(pertussis) because we didn’t really understand how our immune defences against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,” said  associate professor of global health and lead author of the article. “Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors.”  Does this sound like we know what we are doing with vaccines?? 
This also says "Experimental and immunologic data has shown that aP(DTaP) vaccines do not provide herd immunity, while mathematical models imply otherwise."  So why is this vaccine mandatory, it only protects the user, not others.
More on this in the DTaP vaccine, section B in appendix.

#29a.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29883854 This 2018 study shows how poorly our system responds to something that needs changing(Like link #22).  This says vaccine doses should be adjusted for women as they get more antibodies and a stronger immune response and more adverse events. (They have know this for a long time, but done nothing about it!!)

This all means we are correct to be cautious with vaccines. Not everybody needs every vaccine. We have twice as many as there was since 1986.  Some can and should be delayed, and they should be taken one at a time. Some can be skipped altogether.  Some kids should not get any vaccines.
    About 2 to 4% of the population is hardcore anti-vax, they do not want their kids to have any vaccines at all. Many of them already have, what they believe to be, a vaccine damaged child(Remember the CPS says 1 in 80,000 is permanently damaged, link #2).
 I have not seen enough science to prove that we should take no vaccines. But that does not mean they are not correct, because as I have showed, we still know very little about what is happening in our bodies.

D. VACCINES ARE NOT “MANKIND’S GREATEST ACHIEVEMENT”  

"Vaccines are our greatest achievement". I have read that statement countless times.

     The toilet, or plumbing is more likely our greatest achievement, which also allowed clean water. 
Yes vaccines have done good, but not what you think.  Think about this:
    Typoid, cholera, rheumatic and scarlet fever all almost disappeared on there own, without vaccines, in first world countries. WHY?  
    Would not the same reasons apply to measles and diphtheria etc.

 Look at chart 1. below, and then tell me vaccines are our greatest achievement.  
Chart 1 is from this link:
#29b. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/vsrates1940_60.pdf  See pages 82 to 86 (site loads slow, patience). Chart 1 below is from pages 84 & 85. Page through the other graphs here you will see that ‘deaths’ from infectious diseases were down 90 to 98% “before” those vaccines were even invented. Why?  

 CHART 1.  Diptheria vaccine started 1945   Measles started 1963

   Look at measles graph.  Deaths from measles down 95% by 1963 when the measles vaccine came out.  This is the chart the anti-vaxers always show.  You will never see this chart in a school or doctors  textbook.  Why?  Because “we must protect the vaccination program” mantra. 

   Your doctor has never been shown the above charts in his training, just chart 2 below, and its the one pro-vaxers and Industry shill sites show.  I show both, as I am trying to be honest. 

CHART 2. Measles "cases" dropped from 100's of thousands to zero when vaccine invented in 1963

     Make sure you know the difference between Chart 1 and Chart 2.
Chart 1 is Mortality or deaths from measles, and Chart 2 is Morbidity or the number people who got sick from measles.  Depending on which source you believe, only about 1 in 1000 to 1 in 5,000 people who got measles actually died from measles by the late 1950's.  

 The measles vaccine  came along in 1963, was in general use by 1967 and made measles "cases" almost disappear. 
A Diphtheria toxoid was invented in 1923 had a version that was used in 1930's but an actual vaccine did not get into general use until after World war 2.

This article in Pediatrics sums it up nicely. Vaccines were not our saviour.#31.http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/pdfs/45-2000-Pediatrics-Vital-Statistics.pdf Page 1315 left side(pages start at 1307) This article from Pediatrics says “improved socio-economic conditions and public health strategies in the first third of the 20th century are the reason for the major decline in child mortality.  Things like water treatment, food safety, waste disposal and improved housing and less crowding.”  Then says “Vaccination does not account for the impressive declines in mortality seen in first half of the century.”  Says vaccines not really used until after World War two.
    After reading all the facts above, it sounds like we have been told a bunch of BS by the Industry and CDC, vaccines are not our greatest achievement. They have definitely saved lives, but not to the extend we are told.  And there is more harm being done by vaccines that we are being told as well. Section H covers that.

#32.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine  Notice Wikipidia supports the “industry” by not showing the mortality chart, only shows morbidity chart.  Though it does say "for the 20 years after vaccination, measles vaccine saved 5200 lives in the US". 5200 divided by 20 is 260 lives a year(which matches chart 3 below). Not the thousands we were told about in school, using 1910 figures.  

#33.https://jamanetwork.com/jou...   Shows deaths from different vaccines at time of vaccine date. The chart below is table 1 in this link.

CHART 3. Number of deaths just before each vaccine started.

     Notice that there was only 440 deaths from measles a year in the US just before the vaccine was invented, down from thousands a year in 1910. Chart 1. and that was with an increasing population.
   Don't forget measles occasionally caused encephalitis in kids as well, one in a 1000 cases, we don't know if that would be true today with modern medicine.

#34.https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/reports-publications/canada-communicable-disease-report-ccdr/monthly-issue/2006-32/hidden-economic-benefits-childhood-immunizations-capital-health-region-alberta.html  This shows frequency of infectiousness diseases before vaccine date in Canada.  This is just frequency of disease, not deaths.

This shows there is some benefit from getting the vaccine.  For example 1 in a 1000 kids who get measles can have permanent injury, like encephalitis, and about 1 in 3000 die(Link #61).  In section i, I look at the safety of delaying this vaccine for two years.

   

 E.  YOUR DOCTOR IS A “VICTIM OF HIS TRAINING”.  

     

     Your pediatrician is not a reliable source for vaccine information.  Yes that’s true. From the day your doctor enters medical school to the day he retires, he is trained and guided by “Industry”.  By the time they are finished medical school, they think  exactly the way the Industry wants them to think.
    The above is probably "fighting words", but they are true.  The only thing to argue about is 'how true', 100% or 80%  or maybe 50% true? 
  All their medical schools get huge grants from the Industry, they get lectures from doctors who are paid “Industry spokesmen”, their training upgrades are paid and guided by pharma, he is visited weekly by pharma reps who give their version of all the latest products, he gets gifts, travel expenses paid for.

#36.http://in-training.org/drugged-greed-pharmaceutical-industrys-role-us-medical-education-10639  In US
#37.https://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/business/03medschool.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 Industry deeply involved in University medical schools.

#38.http://www.cmaj.ca/content/185/13/1121.full This from the Canadian Medical Journal.  For Canadians. Says  "Pharma influence widespread in medical schools".  And  "Faculty members get direct industry compensation". And more here.  

#38a.https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/family-doctor-college-releases-long-secret-report-on-big-pharma-funding-but-refuses-to-cut-off-money-flow  Shows doctor training and upgrade training is paid for by the industry in Canada, and the college refuses to stop the money flow.

#38a. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/demand-better-health-care-book/  This says, "Half of what doctors to is wrong and less than 20% of what doctors do has solid research to support it”.  Much more here, have a read. 

Your doctor only gets a few hours of basic training on vaccines, also some biology, basics of immunization, etc and then taught the CDC recommended vaccine schedule in detail and contraindications. He will also pick up a bit more as he goes through all the different courses, but there is no way he knows enough to answer your specific hard questions. You will just get the standard “feel good “ rhetoric, vaccines are safe and effective, vaccines are the greatest thing ever.(He has never seen Chart 1 above)

      Your doctor will not know how to recognize most adverse event from a vaccine, or how to report one.  He cannot name most of the ingredients in any of the vaccines.  He has seen none of the science showing problems with vaccines.  He is just told they are safe and effective.  All the ongoing information he gets on vaccines is from the CDC or his pharma rep, thus censored. Most do none of their own research.  
The most important information your doctor is missing, is how many serious side effects vaccines can cause.  Read links 2 and 2a above again and also see appendix.  Your doctor is not shown any of this information, or realize there is 99% adverse event under-reporting.

      Doctors are taught an unrealistic fear of infectious diseases, "you will die, diseases will come back, if you delay a vaccine".  Total nonsense.  This is 2018, not 1910, our streets are not running in sewage. You are far more likely to be killed by lighting than die from a infectious disease if you 'delay' a measles or polio vaccine a couple years.  Some vaccines you can delay, and a couple are a bit risky to delay.(I said delay, not skip.) See section i below.  Some you can totally skip.

      The experts study vaccines for a lifetime and still know little about what is going on in the body as I showed in section C above.  A week or two of research on vaccines and a read of the CDC website and you will know more than your doctor.

Doctors are great for trauma, like a car accident, or if you have a stroke, but not for looking after your health. I would always see my doctor if a have a problem, and value his opinion. But I would thoroughly research  any treatment he recommends, before trying it. 
I believe doctors are taught so much stuff going through school, they do not have a spare second to question anything they are taught, they have to gobble it all down or not get their degree.  They know a lot, but just a little bit about everything. 
 The fact is, science still does not know all the in's and out's of how the body works. Have doctors cured people with arthritis, fibromyalgia, crohn's disease or many other chronic diseases? No, usually just pain management and band-aid solutions. Read section C again.

Note: I would include Nurses as "victims of their training as well". I guess in a way we all are aren't we. We all have to step outside the box at some point, think for ourselves and do our own research.  Most never do.

The AMA, AAP and CPS are “trade organizations”, and as two of the links below show, they get large grants from pharma.  They were formed to look after doctors and pediatricians interests, not ours.  

    They promote and give guidelines for different drugs, “vaccines” and treatments.(See link below). They should not be doing this, as they are not un-biased.  

-Doctors now get almost as much training on how to talk to "vaccine hesitant" parents, as they do on vaccines.  "You must get all your vaccines"
    It is actually the doctors that need re-training.  Medical schools would rather teach a doctor how to twist your arm, than show him all the science you are seeing. "We don't want doctors knowing the real science on vaccines."

-Some say a pediatrician does not need to know the ingredients of vaccines.  Nonsense, this is not a cake we are baking, this is baby's lives. I bloody well want a doctor to know what's in vaccines. How can he talk to a highly educated parent about vaccine safety when he does not even know what's in them.
Why aren't doctors told what's in vaccines?  Because the CDC and pharma don't want them to know.  Their afraid the honest doctors may become concerned about vaccine safety.  Are paediatricians and GP's  just a trained foot soldier for pharma? 

#39.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2016/05/04/peds.2015-4440.full.pdf  The Conclusion here shows many pediatricians get money from pharma for giving vaccinations and ADD drugs in the US. 

#40.https://www.cchrint.org/2011/10/17/american-academy-of-pediatrics-promotes-big-pharma-agenda-labeling-and-drugging-4-year-olds/  Read this article on the AAP, don’t trust them, get much money from Pharma, now pushing Ritalin on kids.

#41.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2525477/  Here is a great article on how pharma funds most of your doctors post graduate training and MPO’s or Medical Professional organizations like the AMA and AAP. How the AMA medical journal gets most of it’s revenue from pharma ads.( do you think the journal would publish studies counter to pharma? This is one reason you seldom see the studies that show vaccine safety issues.

#42.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-YbXtapGHw  Watch first 5 minutes of this funny video to see how little a pediatrician knows about vaccines, and she even says she is not a expert on immunization. Min 14 has more.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GXl_kCLBdE This video shows more of the questions asked above paediatrician in the court case.  She admits, she just gets her information from the CDC, does not look a the science or vaccine safety. 

#44.https://wellnessandequality.com/2016/06/20/how-much-money-do-pediatricians-really-make-from-vaccines/  This is for US doctors, shows they are pressured to push vaccines on you, also see link at bottom of article.

-http://merck.horizonblue.com  Merck, a major vaccine maker is part of blue shield/cross.

#45.http://www.healio.com/pediatrics/news/online/%7b18579419-444d-423a-9555-333878c5a06e%7d/influenza-vaccination-makes-sense-for-everyone  See last half of his article.  This paediatrician says he makes 20 to 30 thousand dollars pushing the flu shot.(Notice disclosure statement at bottom of article, he is paid by Merck)

-The worlds best selling Desktop Medical physicians reference is put out by Merck. (See wikipedia Merck)Conflicts of interest?

Note that doctors themselves often disagree on a treatment.

#45a.http://www.intelligencer.ca/2016/11/07/flu-vaccine-who-needs-it  Here is two doctors disagreeing on the value of the flu shot. Read paragraphs 10 to 16.

#45b.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiK7IRKN9Jg  This 30 second clip is the infamous Dr. Paul Offit, vaccine expert and Industry Spokesman, saying “vaccines are not understood all that well by physicians and we do a poor job of training them on what they are and how they work.

In the media you only hear from the "paid industry spokesmen" doctors, and heath department spokesmen doctors who must "toe the party line".  There are thousands of doctors who have concerns about vaccines, there all over the internet. Look at the many studies I have posted below, every one is done by doctors, many of the studies have 5 to 15 doctors signed off on them.

F. MANDATORY VACCINATION- You do not want it!

--Italy in 2017 brought in mandatory vaccination for 10 vaccines. France did the same this year, and includes the  flu shot. California joined several other states to remove all exemptions except medical to vaccinations, your kid must vaccinate period. Your next!

-Stop mandatory vaccination!

Italy brings in mandatory vaccination for 10 vaccines in 2017, just as GSK a major vaccine maker invests $1 Billion in Italy into vaccine making.

#46.https://www.sott.net/article/352276-Italy-facing-unprecedented-mandatory-vaccine-push

-http://www.investintuscany.com/2014/06/04/pharmaceuticals-gsk-will-invest-in-siena/  GSK to invest $1Billion into Italy, Italy brought in mandatory vaccination with no exemptions except medical after this investment.

Australia has just tightened further mandatory vaccination. It is almost a police state there. The whole vaccine schedule(which is unheard of and makes no sense) is now mandatory or you get no child care support or other moneys from government and kids can't attend school. The Prime ministers wife was chairman of Immutep a cancer drug maker.

Note, edit: Italy just had an election(June 2018) and has eased the mandatory requirements due to massive protests, and is now re-writing the law, we wait and see what happens.

     What’s wrong with mandatory vaccination? Everything!  It means your vaccines will not be improved.  If you have been reading all data provided at this site, you will see they do need improving.  Why would pharma bother spending money improving a vaccine if its mandatory?  You have to take them!
     Some of the vaccines they have made mandatory do not even make sense.  Read link #47 below.  The inactivated polio vaccine for example, only protects the person not the spread of the disease.  It is the live oral polio vaccine that does that and they are using in in the 3 remaining countries with polio. We don't use it because it has some serious side effects including polio.(link# 89c)

-In a free society everyone should have the right to decide what drugs or vaccines they want to give their child. especially when there is some much controversy over them.

   

Mandates are being brought in often when there is no problem.  The most common problem is the occasional measles outbreak.  So why do they always make 10 vaccines mandatory instead of just the measles?

    The answer is, Industry pressure. So far it is not as bad in Canada, but it's coming.

Once the mandate is in place, it is easy to keep adding vaccines to it.

     There are many kids who should not get vaccines.  Some have a serious reaction to one and yet are still forced to get all the vaccines to go to school. These kids are often the one's who get permanent injury.

Another problem with mandatory is it stops flexiblily. We now have several vaccines that have caused their disease to mutate. The Pneumococcal vaccine is causing this disease to mutate to a more dangerous form and should be cancelled(Links 94,95). And the Pertussis vaccine is changing and this vaccine is now very ineffective.(Links 86a, 87)

-Bringing in mandatory vaccination is actually back firing on the government.  Look at California where it was recently brought in and all exemptions removed.  This has stirred up the people and even those who never thought about vaccines before are getting on board. There is a active movement rapidly growing. 

One should note that it is not the ACIP or NACI bringing in mandatory vaccination, it is lobbyists pushing your governments.  ACIP only says it 'recommends' the vaccine.  They never say vaccines should be mandatory.

#46a.http://www.ecbt.org/index.php/about/article/funding  This “non-profit” organization called ECBT or Every Child By Two, is the largest organization pushing vaccines on your kids. They are everywhere.  This link is their website, and shows that their funding comes from the 5 major Vaccine makers, companies like Merck, GSK, and Sanofi. 

-Here is an example of a state(Oklahoma) tried to ram through a mandatory vaccination bill.   It was defeated after huge pushback.  This is just one of 15 states that have tried this over the last couple of years.

#46b.-http://www.news9.com/story/34986532/controversial-vaccine-bill-dies-in-state-senate

#47.http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/an-open-letter-to-legislators-currently-considering-vaccine-legislation-from-tetyana-obukhanych-phd-in-immunology/

Some might call this site a 'anti-vax site', and the only one I link to, but the information is good I believe.

  Read this letter by a immunologist doctor.  The title is not quite correct, but the rest is.  She lays out how "some" vaccines only protect from the disease, not transmission, so forcing someone to get these vaccines is not protecting the public, only themselves and that should be a personal choice.

 This applies to the 3 componets of the DTaP, Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Pertussis.  Also Polio and Hep B is not transmissible in a school setting.(Hep B positive kids are allowed to goto school.)

This shows that "vaccine mandates", are money and fear driven, not science driven.  See link #47b which backs up the above. Also see link # 89c.

Remember the measles outbreak in California a couple years ago. It was a huge media circus, but a tiny outbreak, 160 people out of a population of 40 million. Then they made 10 vaccines mandatory instead of just measles. And guess what, the measles outbreak disappeared,  no one died, no big deal.

#47b. https://web.archive.org/web/20131130004447/https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm376937.htm  This FDA document backs up link 47.  It says that the pertussis vaccine only offers protection from disease, not from spreading the disease, so silly to make it mandatory.

   

#47c.https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/vfc/awardees/vaccine-management/price-list/index.html  Check out this vaccine price list!  Now big money. Except for the oldest vaccines, many are over $100 a shot and they only cost $1 to $6 to produce plus about $400 million to 2 billion in initial capital to recover.

   If pharma can get a vaccine added to the kids schedule, that is a grand slam!  Worth Billions, and a mandatory mandate is the icing on the cake,  and it's even more sales and then they don't need to improve the vaccines.     When I see places like Virginia and Texas who recently made the HPV vaccine mandatory,($180.00 a shot) you know their politicians have been bought off.(next link)  There so much controversy around this vaccine and science showing serious safety issues.

#47d.https://www.cnn.com/2011/09/15/opinion/krumholz-beckel-perry-pharmaceutical/index.html  Texas senator who made the HPV vaccine mandatory bought off by Merck here is the facts.
-Merck's Texas lobbyist at the time was Mike Toomey,  Senator Perry's former chief of staff. 

#48.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/rick-perry-reverses-himself-calls-hpv-vaccine-mandate-a-mistake/2011/08/16/gIQAM2azJJ_story.html?utm_term=.903c511aa803  See this for Merck’s aggressive pushing of HPV vaccine and corrupting politicians. Luckily things are not as bad in Canada yet.  This vaccine is major money for Merck at $180 a child.

#48b.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aM0PFWrlD-I  Here is a good speech by Mary holland to the United Nations about mandatory vaccination.

#49.http://www.mrknewsroom.com/news-release/corporate-news/merck-announces-first-quarter-2017-financial-results This is Merck's financial results for first quarter. Vaccines are big money. Scroll down further and you see that Gardasil HPV vaccine and Rotatek Rotavirus vaccine are now major income earners.  See links 19 and 19A for more on this.

 Look at the sales figures here(or Google it) for Merck. HPV Gardasil vaccine and Rotateq or Rotavirus vaccine are their major money makers. Merck has made over $12 Billion world wide on Gardasil at $150 a hit and Rotateq vaccine is about $110 a hit. They have aggressively pursed mandatory vaccination for these vaccines and have succeeded in some states for Rotateq and several states for Gardasil.  Also successful mandates in other countries like France and Italy. 

        In the US there were only 20 to 60 deaths a year from Rotavirus before the vaccine. Did we really need a mandate for that?

Britian has decided not to make vaccines mandatory and believe it is up to the parents in this 2018 British Medical Ass decision.
-http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3023538.stm

California just made(2017) 10 vaccines mandatory including the Hep B vaccine. Hep B  is silly to be made mandatory. Because it is not a infectious disease like measles, taking or not taking the vaccine is not protecting others.  They allow Hep B positive people to goto University etc.  It makes no sense.
    This California mandate was brought in by Senator Pan, a paediatrician, so someone without the required knowledge.
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVltylG2d-A  Here is a funny video showing 3 lies from Senator Pan.( lies or ignorance, not sure which)
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caiCn57RNFc Here is several more lies by Senator Pan.
--http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article24913978.html  This shows Senator Richard Pan received the largest donation of $95,000 from Pharma to sell us out and make 10 vaccines mandatory, rather than just the measles vaccine. Pharma also spent $500 million to help get Pan and his buddies elected, and about $3 million lobbying the legislature, governor and other agency’s. 

 G.  SCIENCE IS FOR SALE.  CAN YOU TRUST ANY INDUSTRY FUNDED SCIENCE?

-The short answer is, No!

-Before I read a study I always try to see who funded it. If it’s not listed at bottom of study, it can be very hard to find out for the average person. Industry is getting more adept at hiding funding sources.
    If a study is paid by "Industry" it is biased, period, it's just a question of how much. Most science is Industry funded.
    The FDA and ACIP all rely on pharma for studies to see if drugs and vaccines are safe and effective, they seldom do their own studies and if they do it is years after approval.  That's why we have disasters like Vioxx.
When pharma is caught cheating, they get a fine, and carry on as normal. 

I could find a 100 links about this problem without even trying, there is so much written about it.  It is a serious problem.  If you want more, it's out there.

#51.http://www.nogracias.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/deben-las-revistas-dejar-de-publicar-articulos-de-la-industria-bmj.pdf   This from the BMJ  Say’s “studies funded by drug companies are even less reliable than tobacco studies were, and suggest they should not even be published”. Says, “two thirds of clinical trials are done by pharma”.  
Second paragraph says “prescription drugs are now the 3rd leading cause of death”. It is these same companies that have made all the new vaccines that have come out since 1986, it is their biased data that is presented to ACIP so they can decide if they should recommend a vaccine or not.

#52.https://www.drugwatch.com/manufacturer/clinical-trials-and-hidden-data/ "Funding bias". "How pharma influences drug trial results"  Lots here, good article.

#53.https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-research-beverages-diabetes/industry-funded-studies-dont-find-sweet-drinks-linked-to-obesity-diabetes-idUSKBN12V2J1  Says 26 out of 26 studies found no link between sugar and obesity, these were all Industry funded.  Another 34 studies did find a link between sugar and obesity and 33 out of the 34 were "not" industry funded.  The question is, which ones should you believe. I suspect the ones NOT funded by industry.  The point of this is to show that all industry studies are suspect.

     Yet the FDA and CDC and their ACIP blindly accept the data presented to them on new drugs and vaccines. It’s like they have never seen any of these articles on pharma.  That’s why we have disasters like Vioxx, Fen-Phen, Bextra, Avandia  to name a few. Vioxx alone killed 10,000 to 80,000 people depending on who you believe.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954632/  Good article explaining how industry funded studies are 4 times more likely to report a positive outcome on their product than independent research, and much more here.

-When I can’t trust science, I resort to common sense and logic. For example: When science says I must still get the polio vaccine on schedule,  my common sense says, "Now that vaccines have got rid of polio, I think I am ok to delay giving this to my infant for two years.  Note, I said "delay, not skip".

Google “Peer review process broken”.  Someone who says he wants peer reviewed studies, does not realize that process is now meaningless. 

#54.https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/nov/02/scientific-fraud-good-science

-People say you should only look at Peer reviewed studies, but does it mean anything?  The "Peer Review process" is broken and not working as it should, and often meaningless.  You can find many articles on this, here is one.

54a.http://time.com/81388/is-the-peer-review-process-for-scientific-papers-broken/

#54b.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_S._Relman  Former editor of the BMJ Says “The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think its disgraceful.” 

#54b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nAJI2EYL-8 This is a great video on a mother addressing the Washington state Board of Health. One quote: “We have discovered a network of government and drug industry entanglement so complex and so richly funded, they form a pervasive tightly woven fabric consisting literally of thousands of groups all working together towards just one thing: increasing vaccination uptake.” 
   Goes on about how good science is ignored by our Health boards.

H. DOWNSIDES TO VACCINES - Adverse events, Side effects.  ARE VACCINES DANGEROUS?

-If there was no risk from vaccine there would be no controversy, this website would be pointless, and we would all just get all vaccines and be quiet. 

-Unfortunately there is risk, like any medical intervention has. So how much of a risk is there, we need to known that. This section takes a look at that.

   
You will never see any of the science below on the CDC and HC websites, "protect the vaccination program" at all costs. 
There is harm from vaccines and it is time to adjust the vaccine schedule, as 13% of parents already do.(Link #5)

The biggest fear of vaccines is side effects, or Adverse Events. We take vaccines because we figure the benefits out weigh the risks. 
     As I showed above HC and the CDC have adverse event tracking systems, but they have 95 to 99% under-reporting(Links 16 and 17), so they don't know how many there are.  Nobody reports, your not a team player if you do.
    There is one good system in place for tracking vaccine adverse events and that is the VSD with the CDC. The problem is, this data is secret, you need to be a doctor researcher and have special permission to see it, and sign a confidentiality agreement.

-What is the definition of a "Serious Adverse Event"?  A serious adverse event in drug trials or medical setting is any medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or results in persistent or significant disability.
   Most vaccine and drug studies use this term.  

-The first clue that vaccines can cause harm is that the US and many other modern countries, except Canada, have a Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, or VICP.   If there were no vaccine injuries, we would not need a VICP program. (Note that Quebec has a basic VICP program.)
    This program was created in 1986 in the US, when vaccine makers threatened to stop making vaccines because they were getting sued so much, especially the old DTP vaccine was causing so much damage.  So congress gave vaccine makers protection from being sued, and recognizing that vaccines do sometimes cause serious damage, they created the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, VICP and it is funded by a .70 cents surcharge on every vaccine sold.

The injuries listed in VICP are only a small portion of injuries, as even thought the burden of proof is lower in this court, you still have to prove the vaccine caused the injury. Then they pay you, but, To "protect the vaccination program" and they never admit the vaccine caused the injury. They also pay for your lawyer.

      They only pay out for certain injuries. look at the “Injury Table” on VICP website here: 

#55. https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/ ,  you will see vaccine  injuries like, encephalitis(brain damage), chronic arthritis and death to name a few.  The program has paid out about 3.8 $Billion since 1988.

#56.http://www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/ This one law firm that does VICP work.  This shows 6 deaths from GBS from the flu shot, and over 500 hundred serious vaccine injuries they got compensation for. This is just one of 140 law firms doing VICP work.  Note that the DTaP vaccine has the most injuries after the flu shot. The flu shot is yearly so would have more.

#56a.http://www.vaccinerights.com/vaccineinjuryattorneys.html  This lists 140 firms that do VICP work.  Vaccine Injuries can't be that rare if there are 140 firms doing this work, though I am sure many do other stuff as well.

-The VICP program shows that for  about every million people vaccinated, about 1 gets a injury compensation.  This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Many Americans do not know about the VICP program as it is not advertised. Also many do not even realize their adverse event was caused by a vaccine.  If they start getting arthritis or some autoimmune disease days or weeks after vaccine, they may not connect the dots.  Infant injuries are often not caught at all or connected to the vaccine.  Another good reason to delay as many infant vaccines as possible.(section i)  

So given the above, vaccine makers have no incentive to improve vaccines, they have no liability and most states and countries have mandates, you have to use their product. Win win for them.

   The only way you can sue the manufacturer is if they do not inform the FDA on their package insert of a side effect that they find out about. So that means they do no more studies, so they don't find out about anything.

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM623955.pdf?utm_campaign=What%27sNew2018-10-22&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua&fbclid=IwAR28vmllvS0aeucQqGZRrstgnTC0YzC0DCfHic5Jo3jAg5lf9MIlNQFJ_S4  Here is an example of Merck advising the FDA to add meningitis to the chicken pox vaccine package insert as a possible side effect. This is Oct 2018.  (You will never find this in the media)

-The Canadian Pediatric Society says "for every 80,000 children vaccinated there will be one permanently injury”.  Read last sentence in this article.

#57.http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/health-and-fitness/no-fault-compensation-urged-for-those-injured-by-vaccines/article622341/  I showed this link in first section. 1 in 80,000 is not 1 in a million is it.
This is a huge under estimate.
     Most doctors are not aware of this injury rate from vaccines, they are just told vaccines are safe and the chance of injury is in a million or less. Ask your doctor if you don't believe this. 

    Above article also mentions US VICP program and that in Canada you can sue, but you will never win.  

 ACIP meetings are put on-line now. (I suspect this will not last)  See link #60 below which shows the adverse events for the flu shot. These side effects are never mentioned on their public page, this is much more scary. 

#60.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1_U5JMiy-Q Check this out. This is just a flu shot. Start watching this at min 51:58 and watch the next 10 minutes of it.  This is the 2017 ACIP meeting on influenza, At min 52 onwards, it shows VSD data. It also explains what VSD data is. 
First you see the GBS rate is 6 times higher than the CDC public page says it is. Six per million, rather than 1 per million. 
Then you see charts showing the following.  Add the two charts together, shows over 300 cases of Bells palsy,  23 cases of encephalitis, 25 cases of GBS, 6 cases of Transverse myelitis, and 11 cases of anaphylaxis.  All from 4,554,828 flu shots.
    If we don't count the 300 cases of Bells palsy, you have 1 chance in 70,000 of getting one of the other serious problems like GBS or Transverse myelitis and that is just for the flu shot.  What about the other vaccines.
This is more accurate than the VAERS data.
    So you have a 1 in 70,000 chance of serous injury from just the flu shot, what about all the other vaccines, especially when there given all together?

    Seeing this data, is it worth "risking" a flu shot that is only, on average 41% effective, for something your highly unlikely to die from. 

 See  http://flushotcanada.blogspot.ca  for much more on the flu shot, see links 19 to 44 for flu shot risks at this link.

-Should VSD data be kept secret from the public? Your paying for it thru taxes. I believe it should all be public. Maybe they should be lobbied.  Though I heard somewhere they have moved this VSD tracking to a private company so we cant get to it.(Cant back that up yet)

-60b.http://www.vaccinesafetycommission.org/studies.html  Here is 50 studies showing many vaccine problems.

To see more serious vaccine adverse events, go to YouTube, and type in "Vaccine injured child" or HPV vaccine injury" and you get thousands of sad story's.

    And you can also find a few stories showing kids suffering from whooping cough or measles, but not very many.  This is all sad but this is not accurate data and we have no way of knowing how often, or how many of these are made up(I suspect almost none are made up).

HERE I SHOW A FEW MMR VACCINE ISSUES 

     Link #61 shows what can happen if you get measles, and the rest of the links shows what the adverse events of the vaccine. The vaccine is obviously important, but if we delay it a couple of years, it is much safer for the child.

     This link shows the risk if you actually get measles.
#61.http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/measles Click on complications tab. Says for every child who gets measles, 1 in 10 will have ear infections or pneumonia, and 1 in 1000 cases will get measles encephalitis or brain damage, and 1 in 3000 cases will result in death.

   Do these events happen more often than side effects from the vaccine? Do we need the vaccine?  Now that the disease is under control, can we mitigate the side effects of the vaccine.(see section I below) Like delaying certain vaccines and getting them one at a time.

Don't let the fear mongers get to you, there is a few hundred measles cases a year in the US, usually confined to an area, that is nothing in a country of 300 million. About 20% of the people who get measles are vaccinated as well. Do you personally know anyone who got measles?  Did anyone die in the Disney land measles outbreak? No.  It is safe to delay this vaccine. If there is a rare outbreak in your area, then don't. 

     These links show the risk of the measles MMR vaccine.

#62.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22174753  This 2011 Canadian study, which 11 doctors signed, says "1 in 168 kids vaccinated at their 12 month doctor visit for the MMR vaccine will end up in the emergency room," one to two weeks after administration.  Also says at there 18 month vaccination, 1 in 730 will visit emergency room.  This shows the older they are the less adverse events there are, so good to delay this one.

    This confirms the massive under-reporting of vaccine adverse event. You don’t see all these reports in VAERS and CAEFISS the Canadian reporting system.

    This is one vaccine I believe should be delayed two years. I said delayed, not skipped. It is highly unlikely your kid will get measles if you wait two years. Even if he did, it is still only a chance in a 1000 of something serious happening. Everybody over 60 has had the measles including me. 

   All choices have risk.   See link below which backs this one up.

#62a.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22622699 This link backs up link #62 above. Says "the number of subjects experiencing at least one "serious" adverse event was 2 to 2.9%. That's 2 to 2.9 people out of a 100.
   Remember that a "serious adverse event", is defined as a life threatening event or one that requires hospitalization, significant disability, or death.

#63.http://adc.bmj.com/content/84/3/227.short this says MMR vaccine causes ITP in 1 in every 22,300 doses, most cases occurring in the 6 week post-immunization period. (6 weeks to show up so do they blame in on something else, so how much under reporting? Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purport (ITP)
#64.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immune_thrombocytopenic_purpura Says ITP is a auto-immune disease and a blood disorder causing excess of bleeding and more.

#64a.https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/60/10/e58/338042 This 2015 study says “Limited data exists on the safety of the MMR vaccine in adults.  They say MMR safety is understudied. This is 2013 and the mmr it is still Understudied!!  This statement backs up anti-vaxers who say the safety science behind vaccines is poor.(IOM report below says the same)

  Says saw 167 serious events in “adults” and 7 deaths. Remember there is 99% under-reporting to  VAERS.  Looks like mmr vaccine is much safer in adults.  

Also this study saw 246 cases of Lymphadenopathy, which is a disease affecting the Lymph nodes. Which can lead to cancer per Wikipedia.

#64b. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12922131  This from European vaccine safety surveillance  says "the design and reporting of safety outcomes in MMR vaccine studies are largely inadequate". Then mentions some of the serious problems you can get, ones already described above.

#65.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9481001 MMR causes brain injury and death. These injuries were in kids between ages 10 and 49 months. Further down under "Alternate Vaccine Schedules" I discuss delaying this vaccine 2 years.

#66.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2944153/ First sentence of this study says MMR vaccine is known to cause serious adverse events, such as fever, rash, gland inflammation and neurologic disorders. Much more here.

#67.http://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/48/6/748.full.pdf Page1 right side, says mmr vaccine has 3.2 serious events per 100,000 and majority are neurological or allergic. That's 1 in 30,000.

#68.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7zwNZOg8mE  This is "Brady Bunch" measles video.  This is before we were made afraid of measles. Have a laugh.

#69.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MMR_vaccine Go to “Safety” heading, is an eye opener. Says “10% of kids develop fever, malaise, and a rash 5 to 21 days after first MMR shot and 3% develop ”joint pain” lasting 18 days on average. Older women appear to be more at risk for acute arthritis, and even, rarely, chronic arthritis”.  Note that "chronic arthritis" is on the VICP injury table for the mmr in the US.

      Also says “the measles component of the MMR can cause measles inclusion body encephalitis in immunocompromised people”.  

  Says in 2014 Merck added several more adverse events to the Package Insert. “Acute disseminated encephaloymyelitis(ADEM) and transverse myelitis and also got permission to add “difficulty walking”. 

  Also says “between 1 in 25,000 and 1 in 40,000 kids get ITP(immune thrombocytopenia purpura) after a MMR shot.”

     Transverse Myelitis, a neurological disorder, is a inflammation of the spinal cord. You can have numbness, tingling, weakness of arms or legs, dragging a foot, or even total paralysis. Can be confused with polio.

-Up to this point I have proved that serious adverse events are much more than 1 in million. The adverse events shown to this point are the ones that happen if the first days or weeks after a vaccine. And that is all that is tracked.
   There are many long term issues that happen to us and are not being studied properly. 

OTHER SERIOUS ISSUES WITH VACCINES 

#70.https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/scienceresearch/biologicsresearchareas/ucm127315.htm  Read this 2017 article from the FDA. Quote: “The present lack of knowledge in areas of mumps vaccine safety and efficacy is highlighted by the licensure of some mumps vaccines that have caused Aseptic Meningitis”.  Quote: “Problems with vaccine safety can be linked to an inadequate understanding of the infectious process”. Article says over and over how little they understand of how the live virus vaccine like mumps in the MMR works.  

    The current mumps vaccine barely works, we are getting many mumps outbreaks in the fully vaccinated. The article also says “new live mumps vaccines are coming and they do not know how to test if there safe and effective”. Does this sound like vaccine science is settled?

-Is this vaccine causing long-term problems that are not tracked? See next links. 

Another concern now with the MMR vaccine is that it's a live vaccine with human DNA in it and the new science coming out is disturbing. This vaccine uses WI-38 and MRC-5 cell lines with human DNA(from lung tissue of aborted fetus) and this may be causing leukaemia or other cancers down the road. 

#71.https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/scienceresearch/biologicsresearchareas/ucm127327.htm  Retro-viruses in vaccines and tumors in animals. Contaminants in vaccines.

#71a.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105607001042 Says whether DNA in vaccines causes tumours in humans has been discussed for 50 years without resolution.

See Appendix Section A. for much more on this.

#71c. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28483543  This 2017 study Under Results, says vaccination  can significantly increase risk of lupus and rheumatoid arthritis.

#71d.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1005209/pdf/annrheumd00487-0005.pdf This study back in 1993 says while there is a number of triggers for Rheumatoid arthritis, vaccination is one of them. Second page says the Rubella vaccine has the most convincing evidence that it causes RA.

#71e.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607155/ This 2017 study done by 3 doctors including well respected Dr. Beniamino Palmieri needs, to be read completely as there is a lot here.   Vaccination and autoimmune disease, says certain people are more susceptible.  Also says type 1 diabetes was more common in kids who got all 4 doses of the Hib vaccine at 3,4,6, and 14 months of age than those who got 1 dose at 14 months of age.
   This also talks about controversies between different studies, who do you believe, which is tobacco science that industry is pushing. Talks about problems with the flu shot.  Then goes on about many problems in the HPV vaccine.
Read the Discussion section about vaccines and autoimmunity.
Tables 5 to 9 show an assessment of 5 vaccines and once again, like the IOM reports, show how bad our science is regarding vaccines causing serious disease.  There are no good studies.

I have only shown problems with the MMR vaccine, all the other vaccines have their issues as well. But you get the idea, If this gets too long, no one will read it, you can research the others yourself and see the Appendix below for much more on DTaP vaccine, perhaps the most dangerous vaccine.

-As you go thru the list of links showing the many serious adverse events on the MMR vaccine you see it is hard go get a exact figure on how many events there are.  Links 62 and 62a alone, show the rate could be 1 in 50 to 1 in a 150 for serious adverse events. 

   We need a better vaccine, or maybe we should separate out the measles mumps and rubela like they use to be. And delay this vaccine a year or two.

-Note: The 1 in 50 to 150 is short term(less than one month) adverse events.  There is no tracking of, or science studying long term harm. Like cancers that come on years later. 

-Remember we have only looked at the Flu shot and the MMR vaccine, what about the side effects from the DTaP and the others? And if you give your two month old 5 of them all at once, per the US schedule?

   Anyone who says there is no risk, is living in the fantasy world created by HC and the CDC.

How come people think pharma is evil when in comes to drugs, but are saints when it comes to vaccines?  These companies are fined and found guilty all the time. 

They kill people by the thousands.  Read the history of Vioxx for example, they knew this drug was causing heart attacks, but hid data and kept drug on market and caused 20,000 to 80,000  excess deaths, depending who you believe.  And you cant say "well how many did the drug save", because there was other drugs out there that did the same thing and were much safer.

-Lets take a quick look at the science behind vaccine safety.  Go thru these next few links and you realize the science has not been, is not being done and much of it is tobacco science.  
    We need safer vaccines. The CDC has not admitted there is a problem, until that happens we will not get better vaccines.  Another reason I am doing this.

    As the IOM report mentions below, the science is not being done. As you read report, you see over and over "there are no studies available" or "there is no or inadequate research to form a conclusion".  Is this because they don't want to know?

The IOM did a report for NHS in the US. which said: Quote:

•  This group concluded that there are limitations in our knowledge of the risks associated with vaccines. The group looked at 76 health problems to see if they were caused by vaccines. Of those, 50 (66%) had no or inadequate research to form a conclusion. Specifically, the IOM identified the following problems:
1. Limited understanding of biological processes that underlie adverse events.
2. Incomplete and inconsistent information from individual reports.
3. Poorly constructed research studies (not enough people enrolled for the period of time).
4. Inadequate systems to track vaccine side effects.
5. Few experimental studies were published in the medical literature"    

 See this link to find the above statement from the IOM  71f. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/history/index.html

-The above pretty much debunks anyone saying "the science is settled, vaccines have been proven safe"!!

    Then re-read links 64a, 64b and 70 above, they also say how poor the science is. 
     Link 71e, a 2017 study looked at 5 vaccines and also found almost no reliable science for vaccines and numerous autoimmune diseases, did a report similiar to the IOM.

  Also note the IOM report, point 4, verifies the poor tracking of side effects.

-You can also buy IOM report or read it for free at this link. 2012 IOM(released 2011) report on vaccine safety done for the CDC.
71g. http://nationalacademies.org/HMD/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx  Goto box on right and can read a free copy on-line.

Read Appendix D of the report, is an eye-opener and shows how little good science there is on vaccines. The opposite of what you hear in the media all the time. 

In-spite of all this, I believe this report is biased, when you read the introduction and conclusions, you can see they are still sticking with the CDC mantra of "careful what you say about vaccines, protect the vaccination program at all costs". Don't scare the public.

When studying vaccines, you soon come to realize that the media rarely says anything negative about vaccines, "protect the vaccination program". So the average person does not know what is really going on.  The CDC actually has asked the media to not scare people off vaccines. See here for one quote.

#71h.-https://www.rd.com/health/wellness/h1n1-the-report-card/  Here is quote about 3 paragraphs from bottom, when Readers Digest asks US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebeliu, “What can be done about public mistrust of vaccines?”  She say’s Quote: 

  “We have reached out to media outlets to try to get them to not give the views of "these people" equal weight in their reporting.
    Is not that answer astonishing? The question was "what can be done about public mistrust?" Answer "don't tell them the problems".

Whats your risk tolerance level?  Would you let your child get a vaccine if there is a 1 in a million chance of permanent injury?  How about 1 chance in 5000 or 1 in 50?  What are you comfortable with? 

Of course you have to weight the risk against the benefit.

   In the US, your government decides for you, its not up to you, how are you with that?  All schools in the US and some in Canada require your vaccinations to be up to-date to attend public school. (See section F on Mandatory vaccination)

There is much more on the down sides to vaccines. Studies are now showing many other issues that vaccine are contributing to. Cancers, asthma, allergies, autoimmune and neurological diseases, developmental disorders, and more. As I just showed in IOM report they admit all this is possible, but are not studying this See appendix on DTaP vaccine and section on retro viruses.

CDC and most other scientists are only doing epidemiological studies not biological animal studies that are showing all the problems.  This is handicapping vaccine safety science. It is also almost impossible to get funding now to do vaccine safety studies.(The power of the industry) And if you do, you get 'Wakefielded'.(link 17a)

-There is currently almost 300 clinical trials going on for new vaccines.  

-http://www.immunizeforgood.com/vaccines/new-vaccines-on-the-horizon  This is like giving a kid a hammer and everything becomes a nail.  If we take all these vaccines are bodies are going to be in a constant state of inflammation and over drive, and filled with toxins and adjuvants.  Do we want a vaccine for every bug on the planet?  Some vaccines are now causing the pathogens to mutate to more dangerous forms(Links 94, 94a). We can't remove all risk from living, for some of the new vaccines, the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease.  Is it time to say enough!

Until we get the CDC and others admitting there is some serious issues  with vaccines they will never fix them. 

MORE SCIENCE ON VACCINE PROBLEMS AT BOTTOM IN APPENDIX.

     I. ALTERNATE VACCINE SCHEDULES 

Note:  I am not a doctor, so don't use this info for health advice for you or your child.  Do your own research.

ACIP and NACI, the U.S. and Canada immunization advisory groups, both say there is only one safe vaccine schedule to follow.  Yet the Canada and US schedules have many differences.  The same with European countries there are many schedules.  So how can they say there is only one safe schedule?
    I know some countries have different issues.  But is all of Canada so different from the US?  The US has many different regions, yet the kids all get the same vaccine schedule.

Sweden has fewer vaccines than most countries(Link #72a). No flu shot at all, no chicken pox, no Hep A or rotavirus vaccine. Yet they are doing better than the US.  They live longer and have almost the lowest infant mortality rate of any country.(Link #84)
    The US, the most vaccinated country in the world, yet has the highest infant mortality rate of any modern country. Canada is 12th and Sweden is 5th. 

When you tell your paediatrician that you want to delay some vaccines and get them one at a time, he will think he has to "educate you" to think like him.  Make sure you have your facts ready, because it is you that has to educate him.  Though in reality I don't think that will go well. So best just to say "this is the way I want to do things, if he won't, find another doctor.

Here are some vaccine schedules for different countries

#72.https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html Current U.S. child vaccination schedule. Note: See Misc links in Appendix for link showing past US vaccine schedules, when vaccines were added.

#72a. https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu  Can select vaccine schedule for different European countries here.

#73.https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/sevices/provinrotavcial-territorial-immunization-information/provincial-territorial-routine-vaccination-programs-infants-children.html  This the the Canadian Vaccine schedule, each province does it's own version.

   Here is three different "Alternate" safer vaccine schedules. 

1. #74.http://www.loving-attachment-parenting.com/alternative-vaccination-schedule-dr-sears.html This is Dr Sears schedule, it is a bit too aggressive I believe.

2. #75.http://www.loving-attachment-parenting.com/alternative-vaccination-schedule-dr-miller.html  This schedule by Dr. Donald miller, has no vaccines until kid is age two.  This schedule is the other extreme, very conservative, and does not give you the mandatory school vaccines. 

3.  #76.http://www.loving-attachment-parenting.com/alternative-vaccination-schedule-dr-stephanie-cave.html  This one is by Dr. Stephanie Cave, and the one I like best of the 3 presented here. I would delay the MMR and polio another year or two though. 

The reason we want to delay vaccines and have as few as possible is that they can and do sometimes cause a number of autoimmune and neurological diseases.  The younger the kid is the more danger. See VICP injury table). 

 Unfortunately it is not possible to give a total risk/benefit ratio of each vaccine because, as you saw from the IOM report, there is simply not enough honest data out there to make a truly informed decision. 

Vaccines should only be given one at time, at least a month or two apart.  Another goal is to give as few vaccines as possible to kids under 2 years old.
    Pregnant women should take no vaccines I believe.

 ACIP wants to give your kid 5 injections and the oral rotavirus vaccine, a total of 8 different vaccines to your 2 month old infant. Don't.  Though more vaccines are now being combined in the newer penavalent vaccine, with more aluminum and side effects.  Then in the US the poor kid has another 8 or 9 injections from 12 month to 15 month.

My opinion on what vaccines to skip or delay:

1.-Hep B not until kid is at least in his teens, let them decide.
2.-MMR, Delay 2 or 3 years years.
3.-Rotavirus, never.  (Details for all vaccines below)

4.-Hep A vaccine, never, can decide as an adult.
5.-DTaP vaccine, basic one, not the combo ones. Whether to delay this one or       not is is a tough call, it can be risky to delay it, see below.
6.-Polio vaccine, delay 3 or 4 years. 
7.-Varicella or chicken pox- Delay vaccine until 5 years old.( or never if possible)
8.-Flu shot,  Never.  But if you have to, wait until kid is over 2.
9.-Hib  give on time
10.-Pneumococcal vaccine PCV13, Delay until school age, or just skip.
11. -HPV vaccine, never, though this one is not for babies. 
12.-Men B vaccine  Skip.
13.-Vitamin K shot at birth, NO!  Get the Oral K instead.

    See below for more info on each of these choices.

Vaccines should always be given one at a time, or two maximum, spread over several months. 

If you see a serious adverse reaction to any vaccine in your child, you should  never give them another vaccine again. Or at least wait until they are school age before you try any more vaccines. 

1.- Hep B vaccine at Birth is so wrong!  That’s what the US does. Most countries give it at 2 months or school age. Canada has 4 provinces that give it at 2 months and the rest give it to the kid in grades 5 or 6.  Canadians are not all running around with Hep B.  Canada’s two Northern territories give the HEP B at birth as HC assumes the Inuit all live hi-risk life styles, they should be pissed at that.

My opinion is that Hep B at birth or 2 months is a unnecessary risk unless the mother tests positive for Hep B.  I think there is more risk from the vaccine to a newborn infant than risk from Hep B.  I don't think it should be given before kid is in grade 5 and preferably not until late teens or adult.  The shot only lasts about 10 years, so if given as a infant it is long warn off by the time they really need it.

Rather than me give all the reasons not to get this shot at birth, read this great article. Check out the science references as well.  
#77.http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/american-academy-pediatrics-kids-f/  (This is one of few non-mainstream sites I will link to, everything said here checks out as far as I can tell.)
Also see link #100 below for good Hep B charts, vaccine not that useful.

Hep B is mostly but not always, in people with hi-risk life styles IV drug users etc.

Think about this: If the kid has not got Heb B by the time he is one week old, there is no reason, with normal parents.  How can your kid pick up Hep B for the next 5 years?(unless your a IV drug user sharing needles)
 I never got a Hep B shot until I retired and started traveling to 3rd world countries.(With my new knowledge, not sure I would have got it.)

This link shows how under vaccinated the US adult population is, it also says only 24.5% of those over 19 in the US is vaccinated for Hep B.(and the world has not ended)Don't worry about it.
#77a.https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6501a1.htm

      Possibly one reason they like to do the vaccine at birth is then you can not tell if the vaccine caused your kid to be screwed up.  They can say he was born that way. The Hep B vaccine has 250ug of aluminum in it. This is one I feel strongly about and would never give to a newborn infant. This vaccine should only be considered when the kid is in his teens, or forced to get it to go to school. 
     Why do some places make it mandatory, yet allow Hep B positive kids to goto school? Makes no sense. It is not that infectious, so why make it mandatory?
All choices have risk.

#77c.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453016305145 Recent study showing serious problems with Hep B vaccine when tested on mice. Brain issues, this vaccine not for infants.
All choices have risk.

#77d.http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/pdfs/Wang%20Yao%202018%20Cytokine%20IL-4%20Hep%20B%20Hippocampus.pdf This new 2018 study done by same authors as 77c study, shows Hep B vaccine causing serious brain issues in mice. The second lead author, Zhibin Zao is trained in the US.   These kind of animal studies are sorely lacking and are finally being done.  Hep B vaccine induced neuro-behavioural impairments and other problems in mice.

   Now read section on Aluminum in vaccines in Appendix below. Long term problems,  if you are still undecided.

 2. MMR Vaccine (Measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine, is a "live vaccine", it is given in two doses at 12 and 15 months of age.  It is safer for your kid if you can delay a couple of years. I said delay, not skip.
  Measles is the most infectious of all the infectious diseases, so this one you probably do not want to skip, just delay it.
      Think logically. Now that vaccines have got rid of measles, what is the chance of your kid getting measles in his first 3 years of life? Same with mumps and rubella. 

Chances are virtually zero. Even if he did, the chances of serious complications are small.  I had measles and mumps, everyone over 60 did, , and now we have immunity for life.
There is two or three small measles outbreaks in the US a year, and they are usually concentrated in an area. If you are in that area, maybe you do not want to delay, us logic.  If there is a measles outbreak in your area, in will be in the news.

      Now that measles is mostly gone, the risk from this vaccine to a 1 year old is  higher than the risk of the disease.(Re-read "downsides to vaccine section H)

   They wait until the kid is one year old because they know it is not safe to give any earlier. But all kids are not the same. Delay this one 2 or 3 years.

Another reason to delay this one is your kid is will be more developed so that you will know for sure if the vaccine causes the injury or not.   This may be one reason the Industry does not want to give it later than one year.

 Price of this older vaccine is $31.
    Even if your kid got the measles it is only one chance in a 1000 that something serious will happen to him. Everyone over 60 has had the measles, I had them.

 3.Rotavirus vaccine. Totally skip this vaccine. It is a "live" oral vaccine, and it’s contaminated with a retro-virus(Link #82), it’s not needed in first world countries, skip it. This vaccine is about $100 a shot.  This is a new vaccine brought in around 2005.
 Over half the countries in Europe skip this vaccine including Sweden and Denmark, so so can you.(Link #72a)

#78.https://www.cdc.gov/rotavirus/surveillance.html Shows that there were only 20 to 60 deaths in the US before the start of the Rotavirus vaccine in 2006.  20 to 60 deaths does not warrant a vaccine.  There is one or 2 chances in 100,000 of Intussusception from this vaccine. This painful problem that needs surgery to repair.
 This vaccine also occasionally causes Kawasaki disease, is it worth the risk? #78a. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM142288.pdf Page 6 shows 4 in 36,000 get Kawasaki disease from this vaccine. Section 11, says this vaccine is contaminated with porcine DNA.
 #79.http://www.aappublications.org/content/28/6/2007267

 This vaccine is more useful for 3rd world countries.(though it is much less effective in these countries they say, like 50% or less) 

This vaccine is only 75% effective.

  There have been several studies that suggest that you should stop breast feeding your infant for a while after getting the rotavirus vaccine. That is totally nuts!  Other studies show breastfeeding actually helps prevent infant from getting the rotavirus diarrhea. 
#79a.https://journals.lww.com/pidj/Abstract/2010/10000/Inhibitory_Effect_of_Breast_Milk_on_Infectivity_of.7.aspx  This suggests the rotavirus vaccine will work better if you stop breastfeeding for a while when get the vaccine.
#79b.http://rehydrate.org/facts/breast-feeding.htm  This from the Lancet shows breast feeding a infant helps protect from rotavirus symptoms.
    So skip the vaccine and make sure you breast feed kid.

#79d.http://www.calgaryherald.com/health/Canadian+pediatricians+recommend+rotavirus+vaccination/3622871/story.html See this: Canadians 2 deaths a year from  Rotavirus, forget this vaccine it is not worth the risk. Says US had 20 to 60 deaths. Canada has 9 time less people, 1/9th of 30 is 3 or 4 deaths.  With 3 deaths in the whole country, a vaccine is never worth the risk.

#80.https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/medications/zr1251  See bottom of this link. Says not recommended for kids older than 32 weeks. Also says “only 1 in 5 cases of gastroenteritis are caused by rotavirus”.  The vaccine only works on rotavirus. 

They want you to take 2 doses of this vaccine at 2 and 4 months. Don’t! this is a live vaccine and contaminated.
HealthLink BC also underestimate the cases of intussusception. Poor tracking compared to CDC.

#81.https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/biologics-radiopharmaceuticals-genetic-therapies/activities/fact-sheets/questions-answers-porcine-circovirus-rotavirus-vaccines.html  Shows the concern about the Contaminated Rotavirus vaccine, this was written before it was added to the Canadian kid schedule.

#82.http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf  Goto Rotavirus vaccine and you see this vaccine is contaminated with PCV1 and 2 Porcine CircoVirues. They say it’s okay, but is it? This will be the FDA, the same people that told us Vioxx was Okay.
#83.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15737340  Study shows PCV2 can cause birth abnormalites when injected in sows.

#83a.https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-jYsdHZuRhCWlB5dVlaTGMxdGM/edit  This is a FDA meeting on the Rotavirus vaccine.  There are not really sure if the contaminate Porcine Circovirus is truly safe and does not cause infection in humans.  Key phrases are in bold letters through out and last pages.

   Your paediatrician again will freak out if you say you do not want this, but remember he does not know about any of the information above.

4.- Hep A vaccine is on the US kids schedule and to be given at 12 months and 16 months old.  This vaccine is not on the Canadian kids vaccine schedule, and of the top 36 European countries only 2 have Hep A on kids schedules.  So You know what that means Americans. You don’t need it!  Skip it totally, or at least wait until kid is ready for school. 
The vaccine may be more dangerous than the disease for a infant.
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm224555.pdf     Package insert for Hep A vaccine.  Page 7 for serious side effects and page 11 for ingredients.   This vaccine has aluminum in it and Human diploid cells.
The U.S. are the most vaccinated people in the world.  This just shows who's side the ACIP is on. There are almost no deaths in young kids from Hep A.

Per Wikipidia, Americans have the lowest life expectancy and the highest infant mortality rates of any modern country. Many reasons obviously, but one less vaccines is probably a good thing for your tiny kid.
#84.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_infant_mortality_rate

#85.http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1002531 New 2018 study on the high US infant mortality rate. They try to explain it away with guesses and coumperter modeling on causes rather than science.   Says "both pre-term and full infants have a much higher chance of dying in the US than other rich countries".

-Remember, you can always vaccinate later,  but you can’t unvax.  All choices have risk.

5.-DTaP vaccine given at 2, 4, 6 and 15 months old in 4 doses, and a fifth dose at 5 years old.  There is a lot of whooping cough around currently, because this vaccine works poorly, not because people are not vaccinating.
    I do not feel comfortable giving a recommendation on this one as it is to tough to call, read my reasoning.
They give this one 3 times in the first 6 months, because that is the risky period for the disease and because the pertussis(whooping cough) portion works so poorly, also at that young age vaccines don’t work very good as immune system still developing.  This is also probably the most dangerous vaccine on the kids schedule, with the most serious adverse events.(Link# 102a)
    Most whooping cough deaths are in kids under 6 months old.  Re-read section on DTaP vaccine above in “Down side to vaccines”.
     About 1 in a 1000 kids who get whooping cough die. Also consider that the chance of your child getting whooping cough is higher than other infectious diseases, if you delay vaccine a year.
      The Diphtheria and Tetanus components are not an issue and can be delayed two years, but you cannot get the individual vaccines.
     Read link #102a  below which shows DTaP is most dangerous.

       This vaccine has been available in the standard DTaP format since 1996.  Now there is a choice where it is combined with the polio vaccine and or Hib B vaccine, like Infantrix, Pentacle, and Pediarix.  I would skip these and only go for the standard DTaP.  These new vaccines have more side effects and much more aluminum. For example the Pentacle combo vaccine has 1500micrograms compared to the standard DTaP which has 250micrograms. This is getting harder to find, and if you can’t find it then there is no way to delay the polio vaccine. 

         The kid can still get pertussis even if vaccinated, this vaccine is not very effective and there are outbreaks all the time around the country, in vaccinated and unvaccinated. And the vaccinated are spreading it to the unvaccinated, so keep your kid away from any kids recently vaccinated. See this article.
#86.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/26/health/study-finds-vaccinated-baboons-can-still-carry-whooping-cough.html?_r=0   The pertussis component of vaccine not very effective after 4 or 5 years, is not a good vaccine.  The vaccinated are spreading pertussis to the unvaccinated.  So the argument that we should get vaccinated to protect the immunocomprimised is not correct.
The immunocompromised should keep away from vaccinated kids, as several other vaccines shed as well.

#86a.http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2013/02/researchers-find-first-us-evidence-vaccine-resistant-pertussis  2013. Many countries have now discovered the Pertussis vaccine has caused the virus to change and vaccine now not very effective. Says pertussis rates are now the highest they have been since 1955.  Also the vaccine wan's quickly now, only lasts a few years.

#86b.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2631860/ In 2001 the Netherlands first noticed the vaccine was causing pertussis to adapt.

#86c. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/13-1478_article This 2014 study also shows pertussis is evolving due to vaccine.

#86d.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5597764/  This 2017 CDC study shows the vaccine is causing pertussis strain to adapt.
   See link 88d below for more on all this, some of these links from this article.

    If you have any doubts about your kids health, this should be delayed, and if you do, might be an idea to not let too many people get near him for first 6 months. Your doctor's office is where most of these germs are.  

    Do your own research after reading what I provided.  All choices have risk.

#87.https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/54/12/1730/452864  This says the Pertussis vaccine is working poorer than they thought.  It was only 41% effective in 2 to 7 year olds.(see under "Methods").  If it is working that bad, maybe it is a good idea to delay this vaccine a year or two, if it not work, why risk it?
See next 3 links.

Read next two links. Shows they are now realizing that the Pertussis vaccine only protects the person and not prevent transmission.  So there is no point in making this vaccine mandatory. 
#87a. http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/11/20/1314688110 Says Pertussis vaccine protects person from the disease, but fails to prevent infection and transmission of disease in primate study.( So much for 'herd immunity' theory for this disease) See next link.

#87b. https://web.archive.org/web/20131130004447/https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm376937.htm This from FDA says the same as link #87a,  pertussis vaccine not protect those around you, only yourself.
     So why do they make it mandatory in some states?? Is it $$ for pharma?
-https://www.idsociety.org/whoopingc_study/ This is the same info from FDA, but a backup source.

#87c.https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/ScienceResearch/ucm605730.htm  This 2018 FDA study shows they can make a new better vaccine for pertussis, but will they do it? And when?

#88.http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/18207561  This says delaying the DTP vaccine by more than two months reduces the kids chance of getting asthma by 50%. (click link at bottom of this study to get the 2 months bit)

#88a. https://www.bu.edu/sph/2017/09/21/resurgence-of-whooping-cough-may-owe-to-vaccines-inability-to-prevent-infections/  This article which also links to important study, makes you wonder if we should just scrap the pertussis vaccine.

    "This disease is back because we didn’t really understand how our immune defenses against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,” said Christopher J. Gill, associate professor of global health and lead author of the article. “Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors. This is definitely not where we thought we’d be in 2017.”(note article has link to study)

#88b.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2015/01/01/peds.2014-1729  Says vaccine starts out at 85% effective and that after 8.5 years only 10% of kids would still have immunity from pertussis.   Also says there was little difference between the 3 shot regime or 5 shot. (so maybe kid should just get the first 3 and that gets him past the dangerous first 6 months and then forget it, though you the mandatory police to worry about in the US)

#88c. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2015/04/28/peds.2014-3358  This 2015 study says under "Results", that "the DtaP vaccine is 73% effective after one year and 34% effective after 2 to 4 years for pertussis.

#88d. https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-vaccines-can-drive-pathogens-to-evolve-20180510/ This shows how some vaccines are becoming ineffective because they are causing the pathogens to evolve.  See last parts of this article, the section on the pertussis pathogen here and the science studies it links to. Pertussis pathogen is evolving due to vaccine, we need a new vaccine and a safer one, and no one is working on it.

   This link also shows that Hep B is changing and also prevner 7 and prevner 13 are changing and getting more serious because of vaccine. 

#88e.https://www.nbcnews.com/healthmain/whooping-cough-vaccine-may-not-halt-spread-illness-2D11655363  This 2013 article says “Whooping cough vaccine may not halt spread of illness.

  After reading everything here, it sounds like it might be a good idea to delay this vaccine until kid over 2 years old.  This one you need to research yourself. And the statement "all choices have risk" is very true here.

See Appendix for more on DTaP vaccine.

6. Polio vaccine, IPV, given in 3 doses at 2, 4 and 6 months is also nuts.  Polio is zero problem in North America.  Three 3rd world countries still have some small polio outbreaks, so your kid is suppose to get it.

  Delay this vaccine several years.  There is no reason that you can’t wait until your child is 3 or 4 years old.  Again, we have this silly one size fits all approach.  “Its just easier to do it this way”.

#89.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poliomyelitis  In a modern clean society it is difficult to spread polio, read this to see how it is spread. Also says less than 1% of people who get polio, get paralytic polio.   So don't let your doctor fear monger you by saying "someone could fly in from the Nigeria and give your kid polio. No, won't happen. Some guy in the doctors office with polio will not spread it.

      This is another case of the CDC stuck in a rut, unable to adapt.(We know how bad all Federal institutions are.)

In the US, if you tell your paediatrician that you want to delay this vaccine, his mind thinks you said "skip" rather than "delay", and he goes off the deep end with silly fear mongering.  (He "is a victim of his training" remember)

-#89a.http://polioeradication.org/where-we-work/polio-endemic-countries/  This shows as of 2018 there is only 3 countries with polio, Nigeria, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and it is now under control, with 2 to 15 cases each and 1 or 2 new cases of polio. So tell your pediatrician to quit being an idiot, your kid will not get polio if you delay a few years, and no Polio is Not just a plane ride away.

-#89c.https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/10/health/polio-vaccine-outbreaks-explainer-intl/index.html  Most cases of polio in 3rd World countries are now caused by the oral live polio vaccine they use. It is cheaper than the one we get. 
  Goto heading "The Oral vaccine Catch-22" and read this section. Our vaccine only protects you not the transmission of the disease.  So this again proves this vaccine should not be mandatory.  And delaying it a few years is zero problem.
(See link #47)
     After reading this CNN article you realize the polio vaccine should now only given as a travel vaccine. We don't need it here in North America.  The inactivated vaccine we get here is only protecting you and no one else, and you don't need protecting if you don't travel.   And no, no one is flying here with polio.  This article says there was only 22 new cases last year in the 3 endemic countries, and they know who they are, these are the poorest of the poor people, they are not flying any where.
    This is another reason why I think pediatricians are so stupid, I mean poorly trained. They are in a panic if you don't give your 2 month old infant a polio shot, "he is going to be paralyzed", "he is going to spread polio", crazy.  They should read this CNN article for starters, but there too busy.

7. Varicela or Chicken pox vaccine- CDC says first dose at 12 to 15 months.

     This is a "live" vaccine. The disease is contagious.  Very few kids die of chicken pox. The vaccine has mostly eliminated this disease, it is highly unlikely your kid will get this if you delay until child is 5 or 6 years old.

   Your fear-mongering doctor will tell the horror stories he learned in med school of course, but the fact is we all use to get chicken pox and most of the time it was not a big deal.

 Wait until child is 5 or 6 years old or get it when you have to get it for school.  Dr Sears alternate schedule says wait until 6 years old.

    A child under two should get as few vaccines as possible.

Important:  If you have to give you kid a chicken pox vaccine, never give it at the same time as the mmr.  Do not get the combo vaccine!!.

#90.-https://www.bmj.com/content/323/7321/1091   Note that England, Wales and Sweden do not vaccinate for chickenpox. This link says an average of 25 people a year die from chicken pox in England and wales and 81% of the deaths were adults. Note this study is funded by makers of chicken pox vaccine.

     This proves it is harmless to wait until kid is school age to vaccinate for chicken pox in Canada and US.

#90a.http://www.foxnews.com/health/2016/05/17/chickenpox-outbreak-affects-75-children-in-new-york-city.html Shows there is the odd chicken pox outbreak, but no serious problems, they get sick and then get better.

Note, that the UK and Sweden and some other European countries do not give the chicken pox vaccine at all.  Partly because it is the reason you get shingles later. So if these countries do not, I think it is safe to skip or delay this one.

#91.https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/contentassets/f782f28c867c479f8ea0b2ced3e8265a/vaccinationsprogrammet-barn-engelska-16067.pdf Swedish 2017 Vaccination schedule. Notice, no Hep A, no Rotavirus, no flu shot, and no Chickenpox vaccines.

See link #100 and pages 100 to 114 for more info on all this, talks about it causing shingles and that many other countries do not vaccinate for chicken pox.

     Note that many older people are getting shingles today because they all got chickenpox when they were a kid(before chickenpox vaccine mandates), and the virus stays in our body and can come out and cause shingles.

Now that kids are not getting chicken pox any more, because of the vaccine, older people are not getting exposed to chicken pox which acts as a booster and prevents shingles.

    So maybe all us older people should go hug a kid with chicken pox(if you can find one) every few years so we don't get shingles rather than risk a shingles vaccine.

#91a. https://www.nhs.uk/common-health-questions/childrens-health/why-are-children-in-the-uk-not-vaccinated-against-chickenpox/  This is from the UK National Health Service and explains why they don't vaccinate for Chicken Pox.

#91c.https://www.nbcnews.com/health/aging/shingles-isn-t-just-nasty-it-could-kill-you-too-n480571  This shows that shingles can kill as well.  It can cause strokes and heartaches, especially in the elderly. This says there is a 2.4 fold increase of death for strokes and a 1.7 fold increase for MI heart attack. 
   So there is more deaths from shingles than than there were from chicken pox!
 Cancel this vaccine!
-#91d. This is the actual study show shingles causes strokes and heart attacks.
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001919

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384645 Another study showing HZ can cause cardiovascular disease.
-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19815828 HZ can cause strokes

-https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/02/180209114426.htm  Says some kids getting a chickenpox vaccine, got shingles at the injection site.

#91e.https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/UCM623955.pdf?utm_campaign=What%27sNew2018-10-22&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua&fbclid=IwAR00UNM2Qxk2s-rbpQCM-0lhJ1xdtH43O3SosUNa127C4V8uBQSm1acrO_0  This FDA memo shows Merck adding another adverse event to it's package insert. Miningitis is being added and also clarifications to two other adverse events, Herpes zoser(shingles) and encephalitis.

8. Flu shot The CDC and HC wants every infant 6 months old and up to get a flu shot every year.  This goes against the science.
 Do not give the flu shot to kids under 2 years old.  Multiple studies show the influenza vaccine is ineffective in kids under two do to a weak immune system.  It is all risk and little benefit.  See  http://flushotcanada.blogspot.ca Read links 11 to 11c and 22a at this site for the science. Also read link 5b.

   Think about this.  In Canada there is only 1 to 3 flu/flu associated deaths each year in kids under 2. Is it really worth while to risk vaccinating every kid in the country with a vaccine that is only on average 41% effective in adults and almost zero in 2 year olds. With 1 to 3 deaths from flu, the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease for a 6 month old. FluShotCanada link above, has all the math and links to prove everything I say. 

   Note that in Canada, only about 30% of young kids get a flu shot and the US about 60%.(yet both countries have about the same death rate per capita)
-Read link #100 below, GBS rate is 5.7 per million.  Also see link #102Fa, shows is most dangerous vaccine along with DTaP.

    In the US there is on average 130 flu/flu associated deaths between ages 0 and 18 per the CDC. about 10 to 20% are under the age of two. Which works out, the US has 9 times Canada’s population, 9 times 2 is 18 deaths under age of two in the US. So chance of death is less than 2 in a million.  (It is interesting to note that even though the US has double the uptake of flu shot for kids, the death rate is the same per capita)
    My personnel opinion is to never give the flu shot, due to the “serial flu shot problem”, Google it, and multiple other long term problems.  See the FluShotCanada link above.

 But if you want to give it, ages 2 to 12 may be worth the risk, but after that forget it. This also aligns with the fact you want to give a kid under 2 as few vaccines as possible. Note that the US has mandatory reporting of all flu/flu associated deaths under the age of 18, so this data is accurate.  See above link.

 All choices have risk.

Link 72a above, shows that most European countries do not recommend the flu shot except to those over 65 and some children. This should be enough to show you don't need this vaccine.

The flu shot is our worst vaccine, it barely works, and getting it every year makes it loose even more effectiveness.  It has many side effects and just not worth the risk for the average person. http://flushotcanada.blogspot.ca All info here.

    Since this vaccine is reformulated every year, they can't test it, you are the guinea pig.  There are often bad batches that are recalled after they have damaged hundreds.  Remember recently in Europe, hundreds got narcolepsy with one version of the flu shot, and in Canada hundreds got ORS from the flu shot back around year 2000, it took about 4 years to get the rate down.

9. HIB vaccine Haemophilus influenzae b is a 4 dose vaccine. Pentacel or Hiberix.  Take this vaccine on time. Given at 2,4,6 and 12 months old. Is for kids under 5 years old.  About 3 to 6% of cases of Hib are fatal.  It is often combined in with the DTaP vaccine which is worrisome.  Try for the single vaccine.  It looks to be safer than some of the other vaccines. Link #102a.
#92.https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/hib.html
 Says about 20,000 kids got Hib and 3 to 6% died each year before the vaccine in 2005.  That's about 1000 deaths. So if this data is true, the vaccine is important.  This is far more deaths in kids than measles caused before it's vaccine came out. 

Note: this next link for Australia says there was only about 500 deaths a year in kids before Hib vaccination. So doing the math to account for the population differences(500 into 25million for OZ and 20,000 in 315 million for US) you get a 1 in 50k chance of Hib for OZ and 1 in 15,700 for US.  No country would understate there cases of Hib.  So it looks like once again the CDC in the US is grossly exaggerating(Lying) to push vaccination. So maybe the vaccine is not quite as important as we thought. Needs more research.
-https://www.mydr.com.au/respiratory-health/haemophilus-influenzae 

Actually this is more deaths than any other infectious disease, unless the data from the US is nonsense, as my above note on Australia suggests in might be.

(Note: I am referring to number of deaths that were happening in the last few years before the vaccine was invented for each disease, not how many deaths way back 1910 or in 3rd world countries, for example measles only had 200 to 500 deaths a year in the US just before vaccine date )
   At this point in my research I have not found too much data on the dangers of this vaccine yet. 


 10. Pneumococcal vaccine PCV13 Prevnar 13 vaccine. Given at 2,4 and 12 months of age. Has 125ug of aluminum phosphate as adjuvant.  This is another newer vaccine I wonder about.  Skipping this one might be a good idea, or delay it until school age.  It is another newer vaccine that has marginal benefit.  This link says few kids under 5 died from this disease.  
#93.https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/03/health/Vaccine-Costs-Soaring-Paying-Till-It-Hurts.html
The CDC says about 200 kids get disease annually and the vaccine is only 45 to 75% effective. Most of the data on this vaccine is from the manufacture, Phizer, who has a monopoly on this vaccine, so data is suspect.
This NYTimes article also says the cost /benefit of this vaccine is not really in its favour.  I worry more about the risk/benefit ratio than the cost ratio.
 This Youtube link here is a ACIP meeting on PCV13, again they mostly rely on manufacture data. Phizer is also pushing for over 65 age group to get a ACIP recommendation. At $130 a shot, this is one of their star products.
#93a.-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMZjer5dRek  2018 ACIP meeting. They never talked about the safety of the product.

#93b.https://www.historyofvaccines.org/index.php/content/articles/pneumococcal-disease-0  This says about there were about 4800 cases of this a year in kids and 5% died or 240 deaths.

-Note: This vaccine is causing causing this disease to change and spread and it is making it more serious to get.  See two links below.

#94.-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21273480 Rapid Pneumococcal evolution do to clincial intervention. Note, 21 doctors signed this study.

#94a.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2405901/  This is about "vaccine induced pathogen strain replacement".  Some vaccines are causing the disease to evolve and become more dangerous.

#95.-http://www.idsociety.org/uploadedFiles/IDSA/Guidelines-Patient_Care/PDF_Library/IDSA%20Clinical%20Practice%20Guideline%20for%20Acute%20Bacterial%20Rhinosinusitis%20in%20Children%20and%20Adults.pdf  Read page 16. Says "this disease has markedly increased since the widespread use of this vaccine. That's rather worrying.
    This is another example of vaccines causing additional problems.  Like the chicken pox vaccine making older people get shingles.(because they no longer get so-called boosters from being exposed to kids with chicken pox).
All choices have risk.

11. HPV Vaccine   Another newer vaccine. This vaccine is for girls over 9 years old, and now also for boys. Never get this one.  All the data out there that says this vaccine is great is from Merck or GSK.  It is big money at $150. a child.

There is so much controversy over this one, and the benefits questionable, that it is not worth the risk.

Go to YouTube and type in "HPV vaccine injury's".

There is tons of data showing many serious adverse events with this vaccine.  Almost no one in Japan gets this vaccine anymore. In Denmark and Ireland use has gone way down do to all the problems. This vaccine may be another Vioxx.

95b.-http://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/health-issues/new-concerns-about-the-human-papillomavirus-vaccine HPV vaccine causing POV Premature ovarian failure.

-https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/gardasil-guarding-or-gutting-our-youth/ Good outline of the concerns about the HPV vaccine.

-https://www.tokyotimes.com/side-effects-in-young-girls-take-gardasil-out-from-japanese-market/ Japan stops recommending HPV vaccine due to thousands of serious side effects, and wonders why the US is doing the opposite.

-https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/806645  Japan withdraws recommendation for the HPV vaccine because of concerns about too many side effects.  All Industry sources are down playing side effects.

-Over 95% of women who got cervical cancer have not had a pap smear in the last 5 years.  This is a much better way to go than the HPV vaccine.

https://www.facebook.com/ockovanie.hpv/videos/449816465483118/UzpfSTkxOTc1NDk2MTQyMzE3NzoxODg2NzUxNDExMzkwMTg5/  See min 53:30 of this video.  Some might call this a anti-vax video, is on HPV vaccine.

-https://slate.com/health-and-science/2017/12/flaws-in-the-clinical-trials-for-gardasil-made-it-harder-to-properly-assess-safety.html Read this long investigation of the HPV vaccine by a news source that is normally pro-pharma. They did FOI's to get much of their info.  Found hiding of data, not collecting adverse events properly in the clinical trials, and poor study methods.

    Notice at top of this article is a link to a letter from the publisher of Slate that sound like it is apologizing to pharma for telling the truth about the HPV vaccine and then says he would still get the vaccine.LOL. (like I said this is a pro-pharma source).

-https://ebm.bmj.com/content/early/2018/07/27/bmjebm-2018-111012  This is some Cochrane members giving hell to a recent Cochrane report on the HPV vaccine that was very one sided in favour of the vaccine. There are many flaws pointed out. They did not deal with conflicts of interest in many of the studies or with many missing serious adverse events.  Also this says the authors of cochrane study all had conflicts of interest.

https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009069.pub3/detailed-comment/en?messageId=156963219  This Article in Cochrane library dated Oct 2018 shows how the recent Cochrane HPV vaccine review was a sham.  There are many problems with this vaccine that have not been addressed properly.

-Goto to YouTube and type in "HPV vaccine injury's", there is so many.  Look and judge for yourself.

12. Men B    This vaccine is not worth risking, skip it. Has large amounts of aluminum in this vaccine.  For ages 10 to 25 years.

#96.-https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/business/meningitis-b-vaccines.html  Says is expensive and unnecessary.

#96a.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwZ0c0EtqKo ACIP meeting. At minute 4:35 Ed Belongia says he has safety concerns about the Meningococcal B vaccine and are only giving it a category B recommendation. Want to see more safety information.(so I guess the industry will give them more fake data) Men B vaccine came out in 2015, there was only about 400 cases of men b a year then, vaccine for age group 10 to 18.

 This vaccine only lasts a couple of years. Do we need it? 

At minute 50:00 we see that one of the ACIP board members is a rep from the American pharmacist ass.(conflict of interest.)

#96b-http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2014/aspc-phac/HP40-104-2014-eng.pdf

This is Canadian data on Bexero meningococcal vaccine.

page 15 says monovalent vaccine is “estimated” to be 33 to 84% effective depending on age and other factors. It is less effective combined with other vaccines.  And page 14 says they could find no studies on the efficacy or effectiveness of the vaccine.
Page 24 is the recommendations and they do not sound to positive, I would skip this vaccine given the aluminum and many adverse events reported here.
They also keep saying "there is insufficient evidence" for just about everything.

13. Vitamin K shot at birth.  Phytomenadione("synthetic" vitamin K)

This is not a vaccine, but is another pharmaceutical product they want to stick into your newborn infant.  One version is made by Merck. Contains Benzyl Alcohol. It is for preventing brain bleeding in newborns that can happen in about 1 in 100  to 1 in 1000 births depending on source.  Read the first two pages of the package insert for this product.  Scary.

#97.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/012223Orig1s039Lbl.pdf  This is FDA package insert for vitamin K by Merck.  Roche also makes a version as well.

I can’t imagine giving this to a newborn!  Read the first 2 pages!!  Is recommended in Canada and US for newborns to prevent bleeding, is it really needed? 

Baby should be given Oral vitamin K instead, almost as good but far safer.  Read the next link it explains the pro’s and con’s of giving Oral vitamin K instead of the injection. It is not quite as effective, but much much safer. -#98.https://www.cps.ca/en/documents/position/administration-vitamin-K-newborns  Read first paragraph of this link. It was written and 1992 and re-confirmed in 2018 so is correct.  This backs up the wisdom of using oral vitamin K, is discussed throughout this article, as you keep reading thru this you see the science is not sound on Vitamin K.  It’s obviously influenced by “industry”.  Read under “Recommendations.”

   Is this another situation of Industry funded science versus none industry science?
#98a.https://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/oral-vitamin-k-better-vitamin-k-shot/  More good info on Oral Vit K versus injected Vit K. Get Oral.
   Sounds like some other countries recommend the Oral Vitamin K, but the industry funded AAP is hardcore about injected vitamin K and the CPA recommends the oral.There is also evidence that the mother taking vitamin K supplements before birth helps as well.  

   If it was my infant?  Since the choice of oral versus injected is close, I would go with the oral, the body will eliminate anything not used. If injected it stays and this is synthetic vitamin k along with benzene alcohol and other stuff. To me going with nature is always best.  This vitamin K shot has been around since 1944, and as I showed above, we understand little about how the body works when it comes to injecting stuff.

 How much harm as the injected K caused?

#99.-https://www.bmj.com/content/305/6849/341?ijkey=69c0133cec7e49e8537b087ca33aa20713b41c9d&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha

    Vitamin K shots and cancer, best to get the oral vitamin K.

#99a.https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2004/010104s023lbl.pdf  This is Oral Vit K tablets, also made by Merck, Sounds safer than injected Vit K.  I still wonder if they need Vit K at all, are they going with old science? Seems at odds with nature.
 I am against injecting anything with toxic ingredients into a "healthy" newborn infant no matter how small the quantity. It's nuts!

     ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ALTERNATE VACCINE SCHEDULES

 Evidence that vaccines should only be given one at a time:

#100https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17643770 More vaccines at one time is more problems and raised CRP levels.

#100ahttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547435/  2012 Goldman. The more vaccines given at one time the more problems.

- See Appendix, DTaP section for a number of links that show this vaccine can cause allergies and asthma.

#101. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/min-archive/min-2017-06.pdf   See charts here on page 123, shows how pointless the Hep B shot is.  Rising rates are because of hi-risk life styles, IV drug users, HIV, etc.

Read page 117 to 123, good info.

Then read page 100 where the CDC talks about if we use the chickenpox vaccine we will start an epidemic of shingles(herpes zoster)

Then read page 54, 2nd paragraph, says GBS rate for flu shot is 5.7 per million for last 5 years. (The CDC public page says it's 1 in a million)

#102a. http://www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/  This link is a vaccine injury lawyer site.  They post all the clients they have got compensation for and for what vaccines and their injury.

     There are 549 claims here to date. It is educational to go through through the injures. 460 of the 549 claims are for Influenza vaccine.  43 injuries are for DTaP vaccine, and  25 are for injury after multiple vaccines and you can't say which one caused the injury, or it was just too many for the kid. Which makes a case for getting them one at a time.  Of the 25 multiple vaccine injures, 20 included the DTaP vaccine.

There was 8 claims for Hep B vaccine, 5 for the HPV, and three for meningococcal vaccine, and a few other random ones.

    This shows DTaP and Influenza are the most dangerous vaccines.  Note that the influenza vaccine is poorly tested, as it is changed every year.

-https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140212144611.htm   Well-child visits linked to more than 700,000 subsequent flu-like illnesses. (Don’t take your kid to the doctor unless you have to.  Maybe it is best to keep the kid at home, for the first 6 months, no vaccines, no doctors offices, unless its a emergency.)

More thoughts on vaccination. Suppose we stopped taking all vaccines. Some infectious diseases will try to come back. Diphtheria, rarely appears, if you get the odd case of it, you quarantine and you ring vaccinate the people in contact in the area.  This helped get rid of small pox, and more recently, an ebola outbreak in Africa. This could be done with most of the diseases.

 Measles is tougher, maybe we should go back to the single measles vaccine and give it to kids after there 3 years old.  This will keep it in check.  Chicken pox, forget the vaccine, half of Europe does not use this vaccine.  Will we get some deaths? Yes, but we already get several hundred deaths a year from vaccines, auto-immune and neurological diseases and more, possibly many long term cancers.  Also with no chicken pox vaccine we will get almost no shingles. We could have a much healthier population.  These are just ideas I am throwing out. Hopefully the experts will one day start looking at it and come up  with a better plan. All choices have risk.

-For now, it is up to you to make your own changes.  Your doctor can’t help you.  Even if he is a more open minded doctor and has learned on his own outside the box,  he will be worried about liability or loosing his license if he gives advice contrary to prescribed practice.

 All the recommendations above, assume you are not travelling to hi-risk places.

J.  How much should we trust the CDC and HEALTH CANADA?

-No the ACIP is not doing a good job and nor is NACI in Canada

 -As I did this research I gradually realized the CDC and Health Canada will say and do anything to "protect the vaccination program".  They will not let anything scare you from getting your shots.  They will fib, hide data, fear monger, and ignore studies that do not suit their point of view.  They believe this is justified if it keeps the vaccination rates up. This attitude has been in place almost since the beginning of vaccines.

    We are long past the original infectious diseases, they are applying this same attitude to all the new vaccines, some of which barely work, don't last, and are not that important.  Watch some of the ACIP meetings on YouTube and see how they get much of their information directly from pharma and completely ignoring the fact that most pharma science is slanted or biased.(Section G)

     Everything stems from the FDA and CDC, and the CDC gets its recommendations from the ACIP(Advisory Committee on Immunization practice) within the CDC.  So whatever the 15 members of the ACIP says, is what we get. Below I talk about the ACIP and many investigations for conflicts of interest.

    

 Think about this: Trust and the CDC:
- Why do we have 13% of parents following an alternate vaccine schedule?(Link #12 on home page) 

- If the FDA and CDC were doing their jobs, prescription drugs would not be the 3rd leading cause of death in the US.(Links #3a on Home page)

-Why has the CDC and FDA allowed 99% under reporting of adverse events to VAERS.(Link #24 on Home page)

-https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/national-advisory-committee-on-immunization-naci/naci-membership-representation.html This link gives a brief bio on each of the members of NACI.  One member, Marina Salvador, is a Canadian Pediatric Society rep and liaison, and another is a Pharmacy rep. Natalie Dayneka is past chair HIV Pharmacists network.  Aren’t these conflicts of interest?  Some others are medical health officers whose job it is to push vaccines.  As you read through the bio’s here of top experts, you realize this is a list of industry heavy weights, fully vested in vaccines.  Can you imagine one person here saying anything negative about a vaccine. No one there to represent your kid.
   We will never get vaccine schedule reform with this group.

-https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/committee/downloads/nominations.pdf  ACIP application and qualifications needed, and link to members.  One qualification is they must represent a range of professional affiliations.  If you are representing a group, you cannot step out of line, you toe the party line, "yes to all vaccines".

-http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1410049  Page 3 or 1955, right column, says ACIP(CDC advisory committee) has been investigated numerous times by Congress, consumer groups for conflicts of interest, by office of Inspector General, and has been a specific focus of several inquiries.

-http://vaccinesafetycommission.org/pdfs/Conflicts-Govt-Reform.pdf  Committee on government reform investigates the two vaccine advisory panels, ACIP and VRBPAC(with FDA), finds numerous failings.

-https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-07-00260.pdf  This is a newer investigation of the CDC advisory committee’s. Nothing changed, still numerous failings.

-https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/01/17/congress-wants-details-of-cdc-lab-accidents/96551636/  CDC hiding data and not cooperating when has lab accidents.

--https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/judge-orders-health-canada-to-hand-over-pharmaceutical-data-1.4745302   Health Canada has been protecting pharma for years, that may be about to change. This 2018 article says Health Canada now must release pharma data on drug studies, up to now researchers had to sign confidentiality agreements and keep their findings secret.  Shows you could not trust HC.

These next five links blew my mind. I never realized how deeply intertwined pharma is with the CDC and all the different organizations there are making sure your kid kids every vaccine. 

Since pharma can't directly influence the CDC, they do it through other organizations.  I show two here, first is called AIM or Association of Immunization Managers. These guys have their fingers everywhere, there whole purpose is to push vaccines.
-Click “Corporate alliance” tab, and you see they are partly financed by all the Vaccine makers, Sanofi, Merck, GSK etc. Also these pharma companies provide "their" experts to work with AIM. (ACIP= Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice and in Canada it is NACI)

As list here shows, AIM has it's people on all the work groups to make sure  ACIP approves all vaccines. 

-http://www.immunizationmanagers.org/?page=AIMRepresentationo  “Association of Immunization Managers”  This shows AIM has members on all the ACIP works groups.  “AIM membership and staff participate in a number of groups and initiatives to help formulate national immunization policy.”

-http://www.immunizationmanagers.org/page/2017AIMLI  AIM also does Leadership development training and Dr Paul Offit(a vaccine maker) is a speaker, and the fine print above the meeting notice, says "Merck paid for it".(Make sure all doctors think the correct way)

AND HERE IS ANOTHER PHARMA FUNDED ORGANIZATION WORKING WITH THE CDC DEDICATED TO PUSHING VACCINES. 

The Immunize Action Coalition or IAC.

-http://www.immunize.org/aboutus/funding.asp  This is the IAC or Immunization Action Coalition, an extension of the CDC, and their "Mission statement", Similar to AIM's, is to increase immunization rates, to push and promote vaccines. Notice All the pharma companies contribute to their funding and anybody else with an interest in vaccines.  And all suppling their biased expertise.

-http://www.immunize.org/aboutus/funding.asp This shows IAC's funding,  all the vaccine makers, Merck, Sanofi, GSK and more. 

-http://www.immunize.org/catg.d/p2068.pdf  This is the CDC's and IAC response to getting too many vaccines to soon. As you can see they have no idea. This is what doctors learn in school.  We are not concerned about all the antigens, it is the adjuvants like aluminum that is the problem.  
 Then they say it is dangerous to delay, again silly, they are treating all vaccines the same.  Some you can delay, some you should not. is your kid going to get polio if you delay, no.
I am concerned that the these diseases are being introduced in the blood, rather they the normal way through the air and mouth,

-https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/mar/29/tribeca-de-niro-anti-vaccination-film-scientists-response  Shows how the IAC, Immunize Action Coalition mobilized the whole industry to get the Vaxxed documentary removed from the Tribeca film festival. They say it is a anti-vaccine film, which it is not.  Good’ol William Scaffner, the “paid Industry spokesman" is quoted as usual.
   None of these people had yet seen the movie. I have seen it. It is about a whistleblower in the CDC that says the CDC was fudging data on some studies about mmr vaccine and autism.(see appendix for autism section).  The movie never says not to vaccinate, or spouts anitvax propaganda, it does give you food for thought. I could not see why the censored it, other than to protect the Industry.
     Please read this article and look at the response the IAC created, then you will understand why no one is doing legitimate  studies on vaccine safety. You will be slaughtered if you do.

-  ACIP members are suppose to hand in conflict of interest disclosure statements, but these are often ignored and they can also get wavers and vote anyways. Some of the members are good, but remember they are “victims of their training” and take Industry side, or have just lost touch, “we have to have a vaccine for every disease”, no matter how un-safe.

   So thanks to the ACIP we have gone from 8 vaccines to 16 vaccines since 1986 when vaccine makers were absolved of liability(you can’t sue them). Counting all the booster shots, your kid will be injected 32 times by the time he is 6 years old. Dozens more are on the way. 

-https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/resource-library/index.html  Shows vaccine schedules for past years, you can see how the number of vaccines keeps growing.

-Goto YouTube and watch a few ACIP meetings. You soon see they get the majority of their information directly from pharma, they never question the accuracy of the data.(see section G)  They seem to be more interested in protecting pharma than us. For example watch the 2018 ACIP meeting where they approve the live nasal spray flu vaccine again.  This vaccine had been withdrawn 2 years ago because it did not work, now they want to bring it back.  ACIP approved it 13 to 15 votes in-spite of the fact they said they did not know if it worked yet.   

-http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/health/policy/18cdc.html?_r=3 2007 most of ACIP experts had conflicts of interest.

-https://www.minnpost.com/second-opinion/2015/05/revelations-cdcs-industry-funding-raise-questions-about-some-its-decisions  CDC takes pharma funding

-http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h2362  CDC accepts corporate funding.

-https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/301432-the-cdc-is-being-being-influenced-by-corporate-and-political  Headline of this article from “The Hill” says “The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests.”
   A group of more than 12 scientists in the CDC put forward a list of complaints in writing.

-http://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/13/in-sharp-resignation-letter-former-ori-director-wright-criticizes-bureaucracy-dysfunction/  HHS is dysfunctional and highly political.  the CDC and FDA is under the HHS

-https://newyorkcity.legalexaminer.com/health/toxic-substances/officials-and-cdc-knowingly-endangered-dc-residents-regarding-lead-in-the-drinking-water/

  More CDC lying and coverups, about lead in drinking water in DC.

-https://www.upi.com/UPI-Investigates-The-vaccine-conflict/44221058841736/

 In October 1999, after 15 reports of such incidents against the Rotavirus vaccine, the CDC withdrew its recommendation for the vaccination -- not because of the problem, the agency claims, but because bad publicity might give vaccines in general a bad name. 

A four-month investigation by United Press International found a pattern of serious problems linked to vaccines recommended by the CDC -- and a web of close ties between the agency and the companies that make vaccines.

Critics say those ties are an unholy alliance in a war against disease where vaccine side effects have damaged, hurt or killed people, mostly children.

"The CDC is a disgrace. It is a corrupt organization," said Stephen A. Sheller, a Philadelphia attorney.

Much more here.

-http://www.drugtopics.com/pharmacy/weldon-maloney-introduce-vaccine-safety-bill   This is a congressman introducing a bill to remove vaccine safety from the CDC.  Says they have a enormous conflict of interest within the CDC and vaccine safety needs to be moved to an independent office, as currently they are a low priority within the CDC.

-https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-07-00260.pdf  2009 CDC ignoring conflicts of interest and not tracking it.

-http://www.bmj.com/content/350/bmj.h658.full  CDC paid by pharma to push Tamiflu (Read responses tab as well)

-http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002029#pmed-1002029-t001

Financial relationships between organizations that do clinical guidelines hidden a lot.  Read first sentence under heading “Methods and findings”.

-https://www.hhs.gov/about/budget/fy2015/budget-in-brief/cdc/index.html Shows CDC buys $3.5 Billion in vaccines for kids every year. Any conflicts? They do push vaccines on us very hard. If they buy 3.5 $Billion worth of vaccines every year, how can they also monitor safety, it is a clear conflict.

The media has been told to not say bad things about vaccines. See here.

-https://www.rd.com/health/wellness/h1n1-the-report-card/  Here is quote about 3 paragraphs from bottom, when Readers Digest asks US Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebeliu, “What can be done about public mistrust of vaccines?”  She say’s Quote: 

  “We have reached out to media outlets to try to get them to not give the views of "these people" equal weight in their reporting to what science has shown, and continues to show about the safety of vaccines.” 
   If your reading this you are one of "Those People".

     After you follow this vaccine issue for a while you see that the media almost never says anything bad about vaccines.  They never report new studies showing vaccine problems.  "Must protect the vaccination program"

--https://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/doctors-against-research_b_17726.html  This is 2011. The AAP(American Academy of Paediatricians) does not want any research done in regards to vaccine’s and autism.  The government is trying to pay for more research but the AAP is fighting it.  They are not there for your kid. Can't trust them.  Is pharma, who gives them much money, behind this?
This link and the link below have the AAP relying on old science from years ago. They do not want to investigate vaccines any more. 

-https://www.aap.org/en-us/about-the-aap/aap-press-room/pages/American-Academy-of-Pediatrics-Emphasizes-Safety-and-Importance-of-Vaccines.aspx  This is 2017. This from the American Academy of Paediatricians in response to Trump wanting a Federal commission to look into vaccine safety.  This has the AAP  saying any claims that vaccines are unsafe have been disproven. 3rd paragraph. They do not want further investigation!!

How come they did not say "we welcome more studies to make sure vaccines are safe for your kids."

There is tons of new vaccine science coming out that needs investigating!

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89Q2BSfyuMA  At minute 1:47:30 this talks about how the AAP went after a bunch of doctors who were going to sit on a panel to discuss vaccine safety and they all chickened out.  Shows the AAP is not much better than a criminal organization.
    Actually watch this whole 2 hour video, very good.

    Doing this project, unlike HC, I have looked at everything out there including many of the anti-vax sites, some are bad and a few are actually quite good and stick to the facts.  If they don't link to original sources, I ignore them. I talk about this more in appendix.

                                            END

                 APPENDIX

Contents:

    A- Contaminates, Retro-viruses,  Cancer, cell-lines in live vaccines.
    B- DTP and DTaP vaccine
    C- Aluminum in Vaccines
    D-Vaccines do not cause Autism-right?
    E-Herd Immunity
    F- Industry Spokesmen
    G-Anti-vaxers,  Dr. Wakefield, Jenny McCarthy
    H -Miscellaneous 

"Still working on much of this."

You will also notice a few references to what some call "anti-vax sites.  But I believe they present good info.  Considering that 2/3's of the so called peer reviewed studies out there are not much better than tobacco science(Link #51 or read IOM report), don't complain. 

A. CONTAMINANTS, CANCER, RETRO-VIRUSES IN LIVE VACCINES, CONTAMINTED CELL LINES USED TO MAKE VACCINES.

First thing is go back up top and read link #24, it says, a group of scientists want to try and figure had how vaccines really work.  They say "most of what happens in our body is a black box", there are reactions happening all over our body from vaccines. Also read link #25 again. Please keep this in mind as you read thru the links below.
Science still have a lot to learn about vaccines and immune system.

   Last year I read the studies about how they have finally realized that growing the flu vaccine on eggs makes the flu vaccine mutate and become less effective.  My first thought was "they only discovered that now! This is 2017. And if they had known about it why hadn't they done something about it years ago?  Eggs are cheap?
Shows how bad vaccine science is once again.

After reading the links below, you realize the jury is still out on whether some vaccines can cause cancer down the road.  You realize it is a incredibly complicated issue, the experts are still learning and the experts often disagree.
We are giving vaccines to people without knowing exactly what we are doing, yes it prevents measles. I won't die of measles or polio, but will I die of something else because of the vaccine?

https://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/scienceresearch/biologicsresearchareas/ucm127327.htm  This from the FDA shows they are worried about retro viruses in vaccines causing cancers.  Some of the cell lines they use to grow to make vaccines might be tumorigenic,  they form tumours when injected into rodents.(3rd Paragraph).  Says "the viruses could become active under vaccine manufacturing conditions". The MMR would be one of these vaccines to worry about.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3647912/  This shows they have found retro viruses in MMR vaccine(3rd paragraph down) and yellow fever vaccine. Seems the testing they have is not good enough yet. I hope these guys know what they are doing.  The MMR came out in mid 1980’s they did not have the same technology then. Has harm been done?
-See link #80 above to find out about the Rotavirus vaccine and the retro-virus contaminants that are still in it.

-http://www.vaccines.me/articles/bdijz-vaccines-cultured-in-chick-embryos-contain-retroviruses-with-cancer-risk-to-humans.cfm  Good writeup on vaccines and retro-viruses.

--https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045105607001042  Says "all vaccines contain contaminating residual DNA". Further down says "whether this DNA can cause tumours in vaccine recipients has been debated for 50 years without resolution". Thats not very encouraging.

-https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/publications/search_result_record.cfm?id=37459  Leukaemia in humans and other Cell lines. 

-=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-and-autism-a-new-scientific-review/  This from CBS news shows new evidence and info regarding vaccines and autism.  Is human DNA used in many vaccines causing serious problems?  Also has some other links here.

-No vaccines have been evaluated for carcinogenicity.  This is stated in all the package inserts.  Here is an example for Infanrix DTaP vaccine.

https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm124514.pdf  See page 15 line 324.  I suspect there is a reason they do not evaluate for carcinogenicity.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17933552/ Vero cell lines used in vaccines can cause tumours. Much is still unknown.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10379458 Childhood cancers on the rise.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27770235  Cell associated Mumps Vaccine virus in chronic encephalitis.

-http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125622  Cell lines are easy contaminated and detection is difficult.(I keep wondering do they really know what they are doing? How much at risk are we?)

-http://jvi.asm.org/content/77/2/1105.short Retro virus contamination found in mmr vaccine and yellow fever vaccine.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15566860?dopt=Abstract  More on retro viruses and reverse transcriptase activity in live vaccines. Are we at the limit of our technology? Do we really know what we are doing. This link and others here make me wonder.

-https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/publications/search_result_record.cfm?id=25248  Simian virus can infect humans. "Since the emergence of pathogenic viruses upon cross-species infection is well documented for several retro-viruses, it is prudent to take precautions."  I hope they know what they are doing.

http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/regulation_legislation/icdra/WD-3_BiologicalProduct_RegulatoryPerspective.pdf  From the World Health Organization, Scary, second page says vaccines are contaminated.  Cell lines can become contaminated. Contaminants have been in vaccines for years, but could not detect with old technology.

About 9 pages in confirms that the SV40 Simian monkey virus had been in the polio vaccine.(contaminated millions)  Also says Rotavirus vaccine contaminated.(see next section)


SV40 VIRUS IN POLIO VACCINE AND CANCER RISK

Read this article for a good introduction to this issue, rather then me repeat it. - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(04)16746-9/fulltext Read all of this amazing article on SV40. This says from 1955 to 1963, 98 million Americans alone were probably exposed to SV40.  This also says a new report raises fears that hundreds of millions of Eastern Europeans, Asians and Africans may also have been exposed to SV40 in Soviet made polio vaccines and could have been contaminated until the 1980’s.  I would assume Canadians would have got this as well. 
May be causing brain cancers.

      Also says “despite 44 years of medical debate, studies have yet to establish conclusively if sv40 has, or has not caused cancers in people”.(2nd paragraph) (many scientists now seem to think it does.)

    Further down this says scientists were punished for bringing this up in the US.
Then read last paragraph, thought provoking.

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SV40  Wiki says SV40 is a DNA virus that can cause tumours in animals and persists as a latent infection. Between 1955 and 1963 90% of children and 60% of adults in the US were inoculated with sv-40 contaminated polio vaccine.  it was difficult to test until they invented PVR. Also says they have seen SV40 in tumors in humans.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC452549/  SV40 can cause brain cancer.  At bottom of this study, read reference 102 and others.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11897278 Says "SV40 is significantly associated with some types of Non Hodgkins Lymphomas". 8 doctors signed this. Also says "These results add lymphomas to the type of human cancers associated with SV40."

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10472327 Says SV-40 is causing cancers.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6327063?dopt=Abstract SV40 causing cancer in mice.

--https://infectagentscancer.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1750-9378-2-13  By link 67 this says that Hepatitas A vaccine was also contaminated with SV40.  this also says in “conclusion” that IOM and others say that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a casual relationship between SV40 and cancer, but then goes on to say SV40 could lead to cancer. then has many links to other studies.

  

END OF SV40 LINKS

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15908138/  Contaminants in the Hep B vaccine may be causing MS through molecular mimicry?
 Some articles evidenced that minor Hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase proteins could be produced by alternative transcriptional or translational strategies. Their detection is very difficult because they are in minute concentration and probably enzymatically inactive, however, it was shown that they could be exposed on the outside of the virus particles and also be immunogenic.-

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15566860  Conclusion of this says:

"The data indicate the systematic presence of partially particle-associated retroviral reverse transcriptase in attenuated live virus vaccines that are produced in chicken-derived cells. The identification and further characterization of these particles, as well as the elucidation of possible interactions with the human organism are imperative goals despite the fact that these vaccines have been safely used for many years."  

Last sentence says used "safely for many years", This sentence is just dogma, you dont want to be painted as an anti-vaxer.  Remember there is no long term studies and 50% of kids now have chronic health problems and many cancers.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3109487/ 2010 article. The novel human retrovirus xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) is arguably the most controversial virus of this moment.

We hypothesize that mouse cells or human cell lines used for vaccine production could have been contaminated with a replicating variant of the XMRV precursors encoded by the mouse genome.  This has been discovered in person with prostate cancer and in chronic fatigue syndrome.

  For more on XMRV, click some of the links on rite of this study.

-https://www.nature.com/articles/emi201425   Here is a good primer on XMRV and retro-viruses. nothing on vaccines here.

Vaccines are designed to kick your immune system into high gear, the adjuvants like aluminum are there to create a strong immune response. This keeps your immune system going which can cause autoimmune disease.

   B. DTP VACCINE AND DTaP VACCINE

    This vaccine has been in use since at least 1950.  The Diphtheria, Tetanus, pertussis vaccine original form was the DTP or DTwP with the whole cell bacterium.  The DTP was used until the mid 1990"s in the US and Canada.
     Due to many serious side effects this vaccine was gradually phased out for the DTaP acellular vaccine, a weakened version.(See link below)

 Much of the third world is still being given the old more dangerous DTP vaccine.  I guess it is cheaper or are using up the old stock?

The US schedule for this vaccine is 2, 4, 6, and 15 months old and a 5th dose at 5 years old.  Most kids that die of whooping cough are under 6 months old, which is why they give it so young, and they do it over and over because it barely works in a infants developing immune system. And it's a crappy vaccine as you will see below.
Only about 1 in a 1000 kids who get whooping cough die.

 Back when we used the old vaccine, the CDC and HC always maintained that there was no serious adverse events and if there was they were 1 in a million. We now know that was not true.(see below) "To maintain vaccination levels".

You have to ask yourself, why did they change vaccines, this new one does not work as well?  It was because the old one was unsafe, and many doctors and patients were complaining about it.
The newer DTaP  and versions of it still have more side effects than any other vaccine on the kids schedule. See here.
-http://www.mctlawyers.com/vaccine-injury/cases/ These are VICP injury cases.  There is over 500 injuries here, and this is a good real world look at vaccine injuries, not the filtered info from the CDC.
    70% of the injuries here are from the flu shot, largely because it is a yearly vaccine.  The next vaccine by far with the most serious adverse events, is the DTaP vaccine.         

-https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/side-effects.htm This link the CDC gives some of the serious side effects you can get from the different vaccines. For most of the vaccines, says “risk of serious harm or death is extremely small”.  Then goes on to give to give more info on each vaccine. Example, the DTaP, moderate problems are vomiting, seizures, and high fever.  And serious problems like allergic reaction, long-term seizures or coma, and Permanent Brain Damage. Says are extremely rare, but when you start reading all the science you see adverse events are not as rare as they say.
    "Rare" is a relative term, what's rare?

-*https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/all.12830  Says delaying the DTaP makes for less eczema.

-*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=18207561  Says delaying DTP vaccine 2 months or more makes kid less likely to get asthma.

-*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10714532/  The odds of having asthma or allergies is twice as likely if vaccinated with DTP.

-*https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674905000266  Vaccinated children were more likely to have asthma or allergies.

-*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/9345669/  Children vaccinated with DTP had 23% more asthma and 30% more allergic illness.  The children with no DTP and no asthma.  Though this is a small study.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3835080  This shows the DTP vaccine may be more dangerous than the disease, this in Britain 1968 to 1983.

-https://www.bmj.com/content/355/bmj.i5170 This 2016 systemic review says getting the DTP vaccine may be associated with an increased risk of all cause mortality.

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DPT_vaccine  Read last section of this from Wikipidia. confirms other studies here that the DTP vaccine is harmful. It says WHO did some studies that said DTP is good, but these studies came under much criticism. 

-https://www.ebiomedicine.com/article/S2352-3964(17)30046-4/fulltext This study looked at what happened when they introduced the DTP vaccine to an area in Guinea Bissau in 1980's. Then looked back.  Kids were 5 times more likely to have died if vaccinated with the DTP than the unvaccinated kids.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5868131/  This is brand new 2018 study, an update on Dr. Aaby Guinea Bissau study.  Says older kids are twice as likely to die if got a DTP shot as those not vaccinated. And Conclusion says all studies show the same.

 Note, that they are not dying from the vaccine, but from other causes, the vaccine does something to their immune system.

   Note that you can find a number of different Dr Aaby studies done over the years in Pubmed, all saying the DTP is dangerous long term.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063034/  Then the WHO requested this study. No Dr. Aaby this time. they found the DTP vaccine caused up to 4 times more deaths.  But instead of saying stop, they say "strongly recomend further study, but keep giving out the vaccine!

--https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1633157/?page=1 This 1974 article from the BMJ is “A house of commons debate on vaccination(pre-internet) of children. Said that “probably 1000 to 2000 kids had developed permanent brain damage because of whooping cough vaccine. A medical survey had shown that the vaccine was of limited effectiveness today; the city of Hamburg had dropped it over 10 years ago, and there was no more cases of whooping cough in Hamburg than anywhere else. 
The doctor here also say any family with a kid who has a neural development defect, a recent infection, fits or convulsions should not get vaccinated.

  
-- Further down says some of the risks could be avoided by recognizing contraindications.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1648839/?page=1 1974 This also shows DTP should not be given to kids with certain health problems, same as above link.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1630108/?page=1 This 1969 news article shows family winning court case after kid became mental retarded from DTP/polio vaccine.  This is part of what lead up the the 1986 law protecting vaccine manufactures and VICP.

.http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/112/5/e348.full  This Canadian study says febrile seizures went down 79% when changed from DTP to DTaP in 1996.  The new DTaP still has safety issues and the pertussis or whooping cough part of vaccine has serious effectiveness issues.  The science is definitely not settled.

 NOTE, that the whole time we were getting all these adverse events from the old DTP, our officials repeatedly denied it, and kept saying it is "safe and effective".

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEK-Q0OgYB8 Old “Dateline” NBC story.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDkeQKAnas8

Watch first 10 minutes of the video.  Is early 1980’s NBC news story done by Dateline on DTP shot. Some Doctors saying the shot is worse than the disease.  This was only aired once and then forced of the air.
2nd part of video is Phil Donahue on the DTP shot.
-http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/1/e20181036  This article on the old and new DTP vaccine admits a little bit how dangerous the old DTP vaccine was. But still not admitting the whole truth.

--https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0171298515301078 This 2016 study say pertussis vaccine and pertussis causing auto-immune and multiple sclerosis?  Hard to understand his one.

-. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/biologicsbloodvaccines/vaccines/approvedproducts/ucm124514.pdf  This is package insert for Infanrix, a commonly used child DTaP vaccine. Read page 1 under "Contraindictions", which is when a vaccine should not be given.  Shows "If you have had encephalopathy or neurologic disorders from a 'previous dose' of this vaccine", do not get it.  
Then see page 12. Which is "post marketing side effects".
Don't believe the nonsense you have read from industry shills on the internet about post marketing. They try to dismiss post marketing as anything that happens to kid.
Notice there is no diarrhea, eczema, no kids choking to death or car accidents in this list, all things that happen to infants. The adverse events listed here are from the vaccine. The most serious listed here is encephalopathy(brain damage) and SIDS or sudden infant death syndrome.
(encephalopathy is on the VICP injury table.)


The links below will show these four problems with the vaccine.

1-This next section on the DTaP is about problems with the vaccine itself. It is becoming less and less effective, the bacterium is adapting.

2-We are getting a number of whooping cough or pertussis outbreaks around the country in fully vaccinated populations.

3-Studies are also showing that it is the vaccinated who are spreading whooping cough to the unvaccinated.

4-Studies now show that the pertussis vaccine only protects the recipient. Does not protect those around them.  So this makes mandatory vaccination with this one not fair.

-http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/26/health/study-finds-vaccinated-baboons-can-still-carry-whooping-cough.html?_r=0  This says "they changed the DTP to the DTaP in in the 1990’s because of side effects".  This is a gross under statement, there are tons of serious side effects, as you will see going through my links. This article does admit more further down.
   This also says, "people vaccinated with the DTaP are the ones that spread whooping cough to the unvaccinated".(so keep your newborn infant aways from vaccinated kids the first 2 months until vaccinated or 6 months if you delay vaccine, as most deaths are in kids under 6 months)
  Then article says "this newer vaccine is losing effectiveness after 5 years and they are getting many more whooping cough outbreaks now."  (Some studies are now showing it does not even last 5 years.)
Then article then says "the surge in whooping cough cases is to do with the flaws in the current vaccine, not parents resisting vaccination.

--http://www.bbc.com/news/health-30551093 Some serious issues with the DTaP vaccine.  Says Pertussis virus mutating because of vaccine.

-https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/2/pdfs/15-0325.pdf  New 2016 study shows DTaP vaccine barely working anymore. Fully vaccinated kids are getting it. Last page says “pertussis organism is adapting to vaccine induced immunity”.

-https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22/2/pdfs/15-0325.pdf  Outbreaks of pertussis in fully vaccinated kids, also pertussis bacteria is changing so vaccine no longer effective.

--https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23873919  Says Tdap or DTaP vaccine is 53 to 62% effective.

-https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/212/2/294/890134/Genomic-Analysis-of-Isolates-From-the-United?related-urls=yes&legid=jinfdis;jiu665v2

 DTaP vaccine failing. "The vaccine antigen is evolving and has serious consequences for the vaccine to continue to control pertussis." There was 10,000 lab confirmed cases of pertussis in 2012 in UK and 14 infant deaths. 

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOCgUqctqpI  Start watching this video at minute 14:30 Is about pertussis vaccine, good info. Talks about the TV commercial by GSK that says you should not allow people to visit your child who have not had a DTaP vaccine. Total nonsense. See section i for links to studies this video refers to.
Then watch next part of video starting about Min 35:00 Is about vaccines causing some diseases to mutate and become worse. Make sure you watch minutes 43:00 to min 46:00 really scary if she is correct.

-https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-whooping-cough-vaccines-are-wearing-off/  This article shows how poorly the pertussis vaccine works, wears off vary quickly.  Article says we need a new vaccine, but no one is working on it.(why would pharma bother, it is mandatory to take, even though it barley works.)
  So nothing is being done about problem, they just want to give us more shots of the same thing.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26103968 Do not go near a child if you received the pertussis vaccine.  Read point 4 in first paragraph, the vaccinated spreading the disease.  See next link.

-https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm488978.htm This talks a bit about the poor pertussis vaccine. 5th paragraph under whooping cough section Says those vaccinated may not get symptoms of disease but can still get infected and infect others including infants.
Says the mumps vaccine kids get, has mostly worn off by college years. This 2018 article from the FDA, shows that getting a 3rd dose of the mumps vaccine only lasts a few months.   So to those who are pushing a 3rd dose of mmr vaccine on us, this says there is no point, won't work. They are trying to find a better vaccine. 

    

-https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/6/5/00-0512_article  This CDC study also says vaccinated children maybe asymptomatic carriers of pertussis infection. And the Conclusion, third line says vaccinated children could be spreading pertussis to unvaccinated kids.  So has the CDC been lying to us for the last 8 years? We need a new vaccine!! Is any one working on it? No.
    Most of North America(everyone over 25) is now unvaccinated for pertussis if it only lasts 10 years.  There is no "herd immunity".
     The world is not ending.

-https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-vaccines-can-drive-pathogens-to-evolve-20180510/  This shows how some vaccines are becoming ineffective because they are causing the pathogens to evolve.  See the section on the pertussis pathogen here and the "science studies it links to". This vaccine is causing the pertussis pathogen to evolve.

-https://tdtmvjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40794-016-0043-8   This article talks about some of the shoddy studies done when we were switching from the wP to aP pertussis vaccine.
   Read conclusion of this article. Says pertussis vaccine "Epidemiologically offers minimal or no herd effect".  So why is it mandatory in many US states?
    Links 87a and 87b say the same thing. vaccine protects user not those around them.  See next link for more on this.

-.https://www.bu.edu/sph/2017/09/21/resurgence-of-whooping-cough-may-owe-to-vaccines-inability-to-prevent-infections/  This also shows we have never really understood how the DTP vaccine works.  Quote: “This disease is back(pertussis) because we didn’t really understand how our immune defences against whooping cough worked, and did not understand how the vaccines needed to work to prevent it,” said  associate professor of global health and lead author of the article. “Instead we layered assumptions upon assumptions, and now find ourselves in the uncomfortable position of admitting that we may made some crucial errors.”  Does this sound like we know what we are doing with vaccines?? 
This also says "Experimental and immunologic data has shown that aP(DTaP) vaccines do not provide herd immunity, while mathematical models imply otherwise."  So why is this vaccine mandatory, it only protects the user, not others.

-The DTaP has many serious issues and the newer Pentavalent vaccines have even more serious side effects. This one has 1200microgams of aluminum. 

         C. ALUMINUM IN VACCINES - PROBLEMS

- Up until a few years ago there were no good studies of aluminum safety and vaccines, the "one" the CDC refers to, used ingested aluminium, not injected aluminum.

-One silly statement you hear over and over is,  "Aluminum is safe because you get far more aluminum in your diet than you do from vaccines". That is true, but what they don't say, is that  when you eat or ingest aluminum, most of it excreted out of the body. When you get aluminum "injected", 100% of it stays in the body and aluminum can pass thru the blood brain barrier, especially with the help of polysorbat 80 also found in the vaccine.
   Also if your kid is getting lots of aluminum in his diet, why would you want to give him even more by injecting a whole lot more into his bloodstream??

(Am finding there is much more to all this, read the VaccinePapers link below.)
 
-Another silly line you here is "infant formula has more aluminum in it than vaccines". LOL. Then you should stop given your kid infant formula immediately and just breast feed.  See here breast milk has far less aluminum.
-http://vaccinepapers.org/dr-paul-offits-aluminum-deceptions-academic-misconduct/

 Early child vaccines used thimerosal, or ethyl mercury.  Also before the 1980's, there was little controlled tracking of adverse events. The old DTP vaccines was famous for them.

Mercury was taken out of US child vaccines around 2001 except some some flu shots, but aluminum is now used in many of the vaccines.  Both are neuro-toxins.

Note the mercury is still used in the production of some vaccines, but is removed leaving allowable trace amounts, which are not that insignificant.

There is more science coming out now on dangers of aluminum in vaccines, read through the links below. The first two links below are doing a good job of getting all the science on this and explain it much better than I can, so read these sites.

http://vaccinepapers.org

This is a must read site.  This is where all the science is. Here is some scientists studying all the available science on aluminum adjuvants and vaccines. Very worrisome what they have found. See links, read the science rather than me.
      This site also debunks many of the silly studies the CDC and others quote.

--http://www.cmsri.org/research-resources/ Some good research on Aluminum and vaccines. Many studies here. May have many duplicates of the Vaccine Papers site.

-https://www.academicpedsjnl.net/article/S1876-2859(17)30483-7/fulltext  This 2018 study say's aluminum in vaccines is fine.  So I looked for the funding source of this study. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28919482  Same study.)

Financial disclosure shows study got funding* from the Gerber foundation.  Who is Gerber foundation?(caution this is study is pharma funded.) See next two links.

-http://www.gerberfoundation.org/history/   Was initially Gerber Baby foods(industry) and then See third paragraph. The company merged with Sandoz Ltd in 1997 and its name changed to Gerber Foundation.  So who is Sandoz Ltd. See next link

 -https://www.sandoz.com  A Novartis Division- is a division of Novartis Group a “global leader in generic pharmaceuticals. Sandoz is one of the largest makers of injectable products.(Then do not want aluminum to be a problem)

All large companies do charity work, even Monsanto and Merck.

-http://vaccinepapers.org/high-aluminum-content-autistic-brains/  Read comments at bottom of this piece. Vaccine Papers debunks the above alum study.(proper debunk coming soon. 

      *Also note that some funding of above aluminum study also comes from the Agency of Toxic Substances and Diseases or ATSDR. Scroll way to this link to "Quality of Work" heading. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_for_Toxic_Substances_and_Disease_Registry Says has been investigated by congress several times. "Time and time again ATSDR appears to avoid confronting the most obvious toxic culprits that harm the health of local communities throughout the nation. Instead, they deny, delay, minimize, trivialize or ignore legitimate concerns". There main problem is they are hugely under-funded and under-staffed. (Are they just a token presence and there to give study legitimacy?)

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17300950

  Here is a new 2018 study showing that infants under 6 months are receiving far more injected aluminum than the FDA recommends. (Another reason to delay as many vaccines as you can.(Americans, never Heb B at birth)

   Studies are now showing that certain products like polysorbat 80 found in the same vaccine, binds with the aluminum to help it cross the BB barrier.

-http://www.ijpsonline.com/articles/effect-of-surfactant-coating-on-brain-targeting-polymeric-nanoparticles-a-review-3448.html?view=mobile

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013417304749 Aluminum adjuvants is associated with social impairment in mice.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vh-Lqw3kmW0 Watch this video from minute 32:00.  This is an interview of Dr, Chris Exley a world expert on aluminum.  After 30 years of studying aluminum, his career drifted to aluminum and vaccine research and he brings up an important point.  You can get no research money if you are looking at vaccine safety of any kind, so have to rely on organizations like CMRSI for funding, linked just above.(Children Medical Research Safety Institute)

    All the studies out there saying vaccines are great, have been funded by industry one way or another.  The FDA, CDC and ACIP all get there science from the industry, so their decisions are based on slanted science.

-https://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/cd9813.pdf  This is from the FDA.  This is about limiting the amount of aluminum injected in or kids from parenteral nutrition packs to 25 micrograms, due to Morbidity and mortality among patients(Page 1).  “Parental” means “given other than oraly”, like injected or like an IV.

    There is 250 micrograms of aluminum in the Hep B vaccine injected at birth in American infants!!  DTaP vaccine has 625 micrograms of aluminum given to infant at 2,4 and 6 months old, and Hep A has 225micrograms of aluminum.

     This is far beyond FDA limits and given all at once, not over a period of time. And what if kid is also getting the treatment this treatment described in this FDA article at the same time!!

 Bottom of Page 2 says when medication with aluminum is given “orally”, the gastroinestinal tract acts as an efficient barrier to the absorption of aluminum, and little aluminum reaches body tissues, however when parenterally administered, which is injected, the aluminum circulates and is deposited in human tissues.”  Page 3 says they want to limit therapy products to 25micrograms of aluminum per litre.  And that includes solutions and sterile water for “Injection”

Page 12 says a warning should be put on box,  “daily parental intake(parental intake is by injection or IV) of greater than 5 micrograms of aluminum has been associated with nervous system and bone toxicity”. Page 11 suggests limiting aluminum to 5 micrograms a day, but say can’t do that because manufactures could not do this. (so lets give you kid 25 micrograms a litre and hope for the best!!)  The Hep B vaccine that the US gives to new born infants is 250 micrograms of aluminum.  For a 8 lb baby! Then at his 2 month he get about 700 to 1200micrograms of aluminum, all at once, in 3 different vaccines.  Many can handle it, how many can’t?

-http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012805/full This is 2017. Cochrane doing a study on aluminum adjuvants. Read last paragraph of first section called “Background”  talks about some serious adverse events.

   Then gives a good explanation of aluminum adjuvants and different types. scary.

Under heading “How intervention might work”  says recent data shows aluminum can cross the blood-brain barrier.  As you read through all this you realize how complicated it is and how little our experts know.

    It also says there are no studies that adequately address safety of aluminum.

-  Read comments at end of study.

--https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27718183 This says aluminum adjuvant has been used for decades, but there is little understanding of the mechanism of action. they don know how it works, Long term damage? 

This is also about the new adjuvant CpG adjuvant 1018

--https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24238833 Aluminum and vaccines causes autoimmune diseases.

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763

This 2018 Mold and Exely study shows aluminum linked to autism.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114826 Aluminum Adjuvant linked to gulf war illness.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2671833  Aluminum is a neurotoxin and can alter the function of the blood brain barrier.

-.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2198876  Says aluminum is a neuro toxin.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235058?log$=activity Aluminum in vaccines causing Crohn's disease?

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4318414/  Says aluminum adjuvants can collect in lymph nodes and brain, crosses blood brain barrier. Other worrisome issues here as well. 5 authors.

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043661818313732?fbclid=IwAR0LpKvzN_T085nXzBtmlirmKbYHb51RGkEGjoyO_OTFZRowrA7_fA0SYv0  New 2018 study. Cognitive and behaviour problems in sheep given aluminum containing vaccines.  Says sheep get lots of vaccines.

   D. VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM, RIGHT?

-Vaccines don't cause autism, vaccines don't cause autism.  If you say something enough times it becomes true, isn't that  how it works?

Do vaccines contribute to autism? I don't know, but I do know, the "science is not settled".   You hear over and over, "the science is settled vaccines don't cause autism, it has been proved over and over".  I now completely disagree with that statement.  Below is some information and science, make up your own mind.

-The media seems fixated with autism when we talk about vaccines. It is the only thing they will talk about, and they ignore all the other problems vaccines cause. Forget autism for now, there are now so many definitions of it, it just gets confusing, its a red herring.  The real issues are auto-immune diseases, neurological, encephalopathy and encephalitis or brain damage, arrested development, any of which could be called autism.  All these I have showed over and over with science, they can be caused by vaccines. Back to autism.

The standard format for media is Quote: "a fake study by Dr. Wakefield connecting vaccines to autism was published back in 1998 which has since been discredited, which started the anti-vaccine movement, causing many to refuse vaccines." 

    How many times have you read the above or a variation of it. If you have read everything here, you know it is all complete nonsense, yet it is repeated over and over, all over the country until everybody believes it.  (Learn about Wakefield below)  Above comment did 'not' start the anti-vaccine movement, it was already long started, and as link in Wakefield section shows the vaccine-autism connection was started long before 1998 and had nothing to do with Wakefield.

The Narrative out there is that there is hundreds of studies proving vaccines dont cause autism. Wrong, see here.
-The  CDC says vaccines don't cause autism, and mentions all the studies. See here. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html Actually read the links to the studies they give. I do a complete breakdown of all 17 of the studies mentioned here.  When you look at them all, you see they only talk about the mmr vaccine(Probably because of Wakefield nonsense)They mention no studies looking at the other vaccines, or taking 5 of them at once like 2 month old kids get.  I think there are actually a couple, but again, are they tobacco science? Most studies are funded by pharma.

     There is far more studies shows vaccines may cause autism. Just goto the links I present in this section to find them. We have been scammed on this topic for years.
Also see the Vaccine papers site for a better debunking of the the CDC's autism science(its like tobacco science).
  

-Re-read section "C"above on Aluminum and vaccines, has autism data as well. See "Vaccine papers.org" link.

-https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-autism-and-brain-damage-whats-in-a-name/  This shows that you will get compensated by government as long as you call your kids developmental problems or brain damage, encephalopathy, if you call it autism your are screwed.

 Read 3rd paragraph from bottom of this article, they are saying encephalopathy includes autism.  We know vaccines can cause encephalopathy, it is a table injury in the VICP program. Look up the definition of enecphalopathy and it sure sounds like autism is a subset of this, as it covers a broad spectrum of mental diseases. Read last 3 paragraphs, does the government make sense?

READ THESE NEXT 3 AMAZING LINKS 

-https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html  This shows the new rates of autism in the US, also shows past rates.  It has jumped from 1 in 68 in 2012 to 1 in 59 in 2014.(in 2002 it was 1 in 150).  The standard response is "it must be better reporting". 
 It can’t be just better diagnosing(they say that every 2 years, each time the new rates come out), because teachers are actually seeing more handicapped kids in their class rooms. And, see next link.

    Can click link in first paragraph "read article" at above link for study. Note, Dr. Walter Zahorodny is one of the doctors listed.(See his interview below)

-https://safeminds.org/news/autism-prevalence-examining-the-myths-and-truths/  Interview with Dr. Walter Zahorodny who was part of above CDC study on autism increasing. See next link as well same doctor. 

Watch video in this link of interview. Minute 6:10 says "better diagnosing or more awareness is not the reason for the increase in autism rates, they have been doing study exactly the same for 14 years."  Also says we are probably under estimating the amount of autism out there.  He says media keeps saying autism increase could be because of better awareness etc,  doctor says that is not true.  

   At min 6:10 says for New Jersey where they do better monitoring, rates of autism is 1 in 22 for boys.   Minute 10:00 Doctor says rates of severe autism are also increasing steadily.

At min 12:00 says is disappointed that the media is not reporting the findings properly. There is very little in the media.  At min 14:30 says "teachers and clinicians are also seeing the increase in autism first hand", they don't need to see studies.

    Min 17: Dr says CDC and media are not talking about or dealing with problem.

(Note: I verified they are talking to the real Dr Zahorodny, you can find his picture on internet)https://www.linkedin.com/in/walter-zahorodny-b25064aa-https://abcnews.go.com/Health/children-diagnosed-autism-spectrum-disorder-recent-years/story?id=54762329  Autism rates increasing. Bottom of this article, the doctors who did study say better diagnosing is not the only reason autism is increasing.  This also says Dr Zahorodny is the lead researcher for New Jersey state. 

 They say they don’t know what causes autism, environmental factors is one guess.  What environmental factors does your tiny infant come in contact between ages 0 and 2 years? The child is mostly drinking breast milk. He is mostly at home, not working in some job exposed to toxins like welding or factory work. The largest source of toxins he see’s is a barrage of vaccines in infancy. Large doses of known neuro-toxins, aluminum, glycerol, neomycin and many others, there is not a single good thing it a vaccine.  
   Are they really looking for the cause of autism? Do you know of any studies being done? They will look at anything but the elephant in the room-vaccines.

   Aluminum in breast milk is ingested, not injected, thus 99% excreted from the body, for those that like to throw in that silly argument.

  

   The CDC has basically painted itself into a corner, it can not now come out and say it was wrong.

-Also read the sections here on Aluminum and vaccines and autism

-https://www.autismspeaks.org/what-autism First paragraph says "We now know that there is not one autism but many types, caused by different combinations of genetic and environmental influences.

-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism  More here on what is autism.

Below is 4 YouTube videos with top pro-vax doctors saying they do not know is vaccines cause autism.  So you can't say "the science is in, vaccines don't cause autism."

1.-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2cHZa8t98w This is the infamous Dr. Paul Offit saying "You can't really say the mmr vaccine does not cause autism", then he goes on to say that "when you are in front of the media you better say that the mmr does not cause autism, as we don't want that door left open".

In other words he does not want us to know that they still do not know if it is true or not.  Below is two more links showing  Dr.Offit in action.

    -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRAJdyPNWnA Dr. Paul Offit swears at vaxxed people when asked for a interview.

    -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiK7IRKN9Jg  This 30 second clip is the infamous Dr. Paul Offit saying “Vaccines are a violent act against child, we give them 5 shots at one time” and also says “vaccines are not understood all that well by physicians and we do a poor job of training them on what they are and how they work.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFy5cjHMEbA Oct 25/18 Highwire episode. Debates paul offit. Offit says(min 08:20) there is 17 studies down to prove mmr vaccines don’t cause autism. I thought they said there was 1000's. 17 and what about the other vaccines and also combing them together, nothing.

2.-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yd3xdAp9_Zk  At minute 1:10 we have a FDA doctor, Karen Midthun, saying to congressmen at a hearing, that "they do not know if vaccines cause autism or not".

3.-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PS7tqNYW9c  This is Doctor Julie Gerberding head of the CDC saying "kids with mitochondria disorders can get autism like symptoms from vaccine". What are "autism like symptoms"? Isn't that autism? Julie moved on to become head of Merck's vaccine division.

4.-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZFPpHBNp2M  This video is 4 time emmy award winner Sharly Atkinson interview of Doctor Bernadine Healy, former director of National Institute of Health, and former CEO of  Amercian Red Cross.  She says the science is 'not' settled regarding vaccines and autism.

The studies that definitively say vaccines don't cause autism, all have problems. The study below is the most recent to have made big headlines in the media. It is full of problems and the media completely ignored them.  See here.

 This new JAMA study says no link between MMR and Autism.  Again study just looked at MMR vaccine!!! No one looks at the other vaccines, especially the ones with aluminum. 
But is study suspect??http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2275444&resultClick=24  Goto bottom of this study, to "Article information." Then see"Coresponding Author" Says they work for Lewin group. Also see "conflicts of interest" lower down. Another works for Optum, see below. 

-http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_09/019900.php  This says Washington post writes that the Lewin group that did another study, was accused of "manipulating data" by the New York attorney General and the AMA.  Lewin group and Optum are both owned by United Health Group,the largest private healthcare insurance company in the US.  Bias there?? Why would they even do this study?? (See jbhandleyBlog link below for much more.)

-http://vtdigger.org/2014/08/15/optum-right-choice-despite-past-legal-problems-miller-says/  Optum company rebranded recently from Ingenix after paying out for a massive fraud case. 
Note: See next link jbHandley blog for more on this study, info is way down in his long post(word search "Lewin group")

 Another important point the media completely ignored is that this study 'only looked at the MMR vaccine' to see if vaccines cause autism, one of the few vaccines without aluminum.  Also see next link, it debunks this study.

-I will be linking to a few anti-vax sites here, don't freak out. These are the good sites, that try to stick to the facts.

-https://jbhandleyblog.com/home/2018/diabolically  This is a anti-vax site, but one of the good ones.  This gives a good breakdown of some of the dishonest things the media says about vaccines and autism and Wakefield study.  Also a good ripping on the Lewin group vaccine autism study, shows how terrible it was.

-http://icandecide.org/white-papers/ICAN-AluminumAdjuvant-Autism.pdf  Here is a good overall summary of Aluminum and autism, using many of the new studies now out, and showing how the CDC has not done proper research.  ICAN is a anti-vax site, but I believe this is good information, read it.

-http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/acetaminophen-use-early-childhood-whats-evidence/ Acetaminophen and autism. It should not be taken with vaccines.

-https://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/critical-thinking-201-vaccine-science/ This is a good article on how pharma and the CDC fake studies. Last part of article shows how the CDC faked a thimerosal autism study, with supporting document.
    I notice they name a CDC official by name, and accuse her of helping to falsify data. Is not that grounds for libel if it were not true?  So I guess it is true, I notice nothing was done, let sleeping dogs lie? 
    The CDC also faked data in the Thompson whistleblower case, which resulted in the movie "VAXXED", and is still in the courts.

-https://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/autism-immune-system/ Another great article connecting vaccines to autism, with lots of links to science.

-http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/unavoidably-unsafe/ Interesting read.

-http://www.autismwhyandhow.org/what-is-autism/neurological-disorder/ Autism is a neurological disorder.

-https://medlineplus.gov/autismspectrumdisorder.html Autism is a neurological and developmental disorder.

-https://www.focusih.com/autism-autoimmune/  Could Autism be an Autoimmune disease?   We know vaccines cause auto-immune diseases.

-https://www.cbsnews.com/news/vaccines-and-autism-a-new-scientific-review/
Good article on vaccines and autism from CBS news, and some CDC links on autism at bottom to see both sides of story.

--https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697751/  Certain children may be more susceptible to vaccines and autism than others. children with mild mitochondrial defect may be more susceptible to toxins like mercury.

--http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/29/hcsg.01.html  scroll down half a page and you have Julie Gerberding CDC director saying it is possible vaccines could cause autism.

-http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.ca/2007/06/no-evidence-of-any-link.html
This is a list of studies someone put together that suggest links between vaccines and autism. This list seems to include a lot of studies with no real link, but there is a few good ones here.  I Have not looked at them all.

--http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:MX0zrGSFOdcJ:www.cbsnews.com/news/autism-why-the-debate-rages-15-06-2007/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=safari  Great article from Sheryl Atkinson on why people are still debating vaccines and don’t trust the system.

- http://www.cbsnews.com/news/leading-dr-vaccines-autism-worth-study/   This link is CBS news and way down article, says gov paid out to 1322 people for vaccine brain damage.  If you say your damage is brain damage not autism then you get compensation.  Also says gov does not want to do vaccine safety studies, they are afraid of what they might find. 

-http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/times-autism-epidemic-denials/  Great article on vaccines and autism.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/  Says vaccines may be causing autism.  2009 paper

--https://www.hippocraticpost.com/infection-disease/aluminium-and-autism/  More on Aluminum and autism.  by Dr. Exely.  Also read section C above on aluminum.

-https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/garbage-in-garbage-out-researchers-dress-down-cochrane-for-its-flawed-and-biased-review-of-hpv-vaccines/  This is a anti-vax site but with good info.  This is good info on Hep B vaccine and autism.  If you don't want to believe site, then got to links provided for all the science studies and read them for yourself.

-http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/clear-legal-basis-vaccines-cause-autism  This anti-vax site has some good info on autism is more likely in kids with a mitochondrial disorder, these kids should not be vaccinated. Good info here on court cases of autism and the VICP.

--https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/research.html  This is the CDC's side of the story on vaccines and autism.  Notice all the studies they talk about are about mmr or thimerosal, and antigens instead of adjuvants and never look at aluminum the main suspected culprit.

-https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html  This is the CDC page on autism and it lists the 17 studies that they say proves vaccines don't cause autiism. Lets look at them.  
-First is a 2013 CDC study done my Frank DeStaffano, the same guy who helped Dr. William Thompson hide vaccine autism data before Thompson became a whistle blower, so do we trust him?  The Study does not look at vaccine adjuvants like aluminum.   It is just looking at antigens I believe.
-Then it mentions 1 study in 2004 and also 9 other studies that only looked at thimerosal and autism and mmr. And there all CDC studies, so suspect.
-Then at bottom of this CDC page is 6 more studies
   The first is a meta analysis and looks at all the crappy studies already mentioned and decides vaccines don't cause autism, this is not a study.
   Neither is the next one really studying anything, just vaccines don't cause autism.
    Next is not a study either, just a link to IOM report. And next after that is another thimerosal study.  And the next study just looks at the mmr vaccine as well.
    At very bottom of this link, it says other vaccine ingredients do not cause autism, but if you click the link, it just goes to a page that deny's but mentions no studies. There is no studies.
   That's it. That's all they got to prove vaccines don't cause autism.  Note this is 17 studies and jives with the YouTube video just above by the Rabid Vaxer Dr. Paul Offit who also says there is 17 studies to prove vaccines don't cause autism.

    Don't we hear all the time that there is countless studies saying vaccines dont cause autism.  As you can see that was dogma, just like the "science is settled on vaccines" dogma, "pharma does not make money off vaccines" dogma. All I have proved wrong on this site.
     You notice  that the CDC mentions none of the studies from "Vaccine papers.org or any of the others I link to here, that show vaccine could cause autism.  Also note that the CDC's 17 studies are all on thimerosal and or mmr vaccine.  The DTaP vaccine is the most dangerous vaccine and notice they made sure they did not study that one at all in regards to autism. Notice they did no aluminum in vaccines studies. 
 There is one study apparently but it only looked at "ingested aluminum", not injected aluminum. 

   E.   HERD IMMUNITY

I think most people know what "herd immunity" is.  But the fact is we do not have herd immunity for some of our vaccines.

-http://www.traveldoctor.co.nz/vaccinations.aspx  How long do vaccines last? This has been hard to find out, are they hiding this information. I finally found this link which shows how long the different vaccines last.
 I notice Pertussis vaccine is missing, lasts about 3 to 6 years now(see DTaP section B in appendix. This says Diphtheria is 10 years. So everybody over 20 is no longer vaccinated for many of our diseases.  And guess what! The world is not ending, where are the massive outbreaks and deaths??

     They say if we keep the population 95% vaccinated, we do not get serious  measles outbreaks, at least thats what they say.  though we do we get the odd one even in fully vaccinated groups as vaccine it is not perfect.

   But for some other vaccines like the meningitis vaccine that only lasts a couple of years, you will never get herd immunity.

The DTaP vaccine: Diphtheria is gone and tetanus is not a infectious disease. So lets look at Pertussis, the vaccine is now failing miserably. with a 3 to 8 year life.  We are getting outbreaks of whooping cough everywhere.  The vaccine we all got as kids has long worn off for adults, we basically have almost no one over 20 who is vaccinated for pertussis. The CDC is now saying we should get this vaccine every 10 years, but almost no one is getting it.    The pertussis  bug is also adapting to the vaccine and changed.(see section B of appendix)And new studies now show it is the kids vaccinated for pertussis that are giving it to unvaccinated kids.(Keep your new born babies well away from any kids vaccinated for whooping cough.)  

  So we are not even close to herd immunity for the DTaP vaccine, yet we are doing just fine, it is not a national crisis. 

Where is the epidemic's and massive death tolls? There is none.  Because we now have clean healthy society's , clean water, good medical care.

See section B on DTP vaccine in appendix. 
   The flu shot which works an average of 40% of the time and often much less, especially in seniors, we will never get herd immunity.

-http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/295562-if-only-half-of-america-is-properly-vaccinated-where-are-the   Here is a good article on "Herd Immunity" though a couple of its arguments are not quite right, article is basically correct.

 F. INDUSTRY SPOKESMEN AND INDUSTRY SHILL SITES

Maybe those 13% of parents are correct and the ACIP is in the stone age.  Any time a pediatrician is quoted on this subject in the media, you get fear mongering. “Your risking the health of everyone!”  Nonsense!  The doctors in the media are paid industry spokesmen. Like this pediatrician.

-https://www.healio.com/pediatrics/news/online/%7b18579419-444d-423a-9555-333878c5a06e%7d/influenza-vaccination-makes-sense-for-everyone  Read second half of this article as this doctor promotes the flu shot. Notice Disclosure statement at bottom of article, “paid spokesman for Merck and Sanofi-Pasteur.  There are dozens of these doctors out there, I would not want one near my kid.

Or this doctor William Schaffner, another paid industry spokesman, maybe the most quoted doctor in the media.

--https://www.ebcala.org/areas-of-law/vaccine-law/cdc-recommends-hpv-vaccine-for-boys  Schaffner is a paid Merck consultant says.

--http://paraven.net/conflicts-of-interest-in-u-s-government-vaccine-policies/  William Schaffner paid $38,000 by Pfizer and Sanofi Pasteur.

-Another media darling is Dr. Peter Hotez.

-https://www.bcm.edu/people/view/peter-hotez-m-d-ph-d/b1846a47-ffed-11e2-be68-080027880ca6  Hotez works at Texas children hospital centre for “Vaccine Development”. and was president of Sabin vaccine institute.

-https://www.sabin.org/updates/blog/sabin-president-peter-hotez-honored-distinguished-achievement-award-b’nai-b’rith  These doctors make money off promoting vaccines, you can't trust them.

-Another industry spokes man is Dr.  Paul Offit, the co-inventer of the rotavirus vaccine, and comes out a lot of twisted science to push vaccines.

    Almost any doctor quoted in the media is a industry spokesman or a HC or CDC rep who has to quote the party line.
-https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/anti-vaccine-hotspots-rise-across-u-s-study-finds-n882461 This is an example of Dr Hotez in action.  Again the media uses pharma reps  to try and push vaccines.  If the government wants us to take them serious, quite using Industry spokesman.  Also notice how it always autism they bring up instead of all the other problems vaccines cause.  And it is just measles that comes up and then they want to make them all mandatory.
  See links in this article they link to more articles quoting Hotez.

--http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/21/business/21merck.html   Merck backs off on extreme lobbying as parents start a backlash.  Merck is lobbying for forced HPV vaccination in all states, has already succeeded in several states like Texas and Rhode Island. People think if the government says take it, its good for you. They don’t realize the government is bought off and doing Merck’s bidding. HPV is one vaccine that should be canceled.(some say HPV stands for “Help Pay for Vioxx)

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/ This study shows the incredible lengths Merck went to push the HPV vaccine on the population.

INDUSTRY SHILL SITES
 Along with industry spokesmen we have the Industry shill sites like:
-Respectful Insolence with Orac
-Science based Medicine
-Skeptical Raptor
   There are a number of others.
You will come across these sites as you research vaccines, they trash anyone who questions vaccines in the slightest and are over the top in their zeal defending vaccines.
 You can tell when you are on one of these sites usually by the amount of "trash talk" they do in between the biased science they quote.   Usually about a third of their verbage is trash talking anti-vaxers with no real facts.  These sites usually link to each other as proof of something.  Another clue is they are over the top in defending vaccines and never admit to a single problem with vaccines.  You may be fooled the first couple of times you read these sites, but it soon comes clear that they are mostly BS.

G. ANTI-VAXERS, ANTI-VAX WEBSITES , Dr. ANDREW WAKEFIELD

-Most of the anti-vax websites are started by a parent with a vaccine injured child.  The system tells the parent it is just a 'coincidence', vaccines don't harm kids. The parent is of course furious and starts researching.

-My thoughts on this. For a child to get neurological injury like GBS or transverse mylitis, or encephalopathy, something has to happen.  A child can get this from a severe fever, bad case of influenza, a virus(vaccines have virus in them), or other illness or, a vaccine.  But they never get any of these problems just walking down the street.  You are not walking down the street perfectly healthy and suddenly paralyzed or struck with brain damage.  You don't just suddenly get GBS for no reason.

     My point is, there has to be a trigger, this point doctors blindly ignore.  A parent has a perfectly healthy child, takes him in for his 6 month vaccines, gets his 5 doses of vaccines and then hours later child starts having seizures and, or fever or constant screaming. You go back and see doctor and  are told "that is normal" and he will be fine tomorrow.  The next day your kid has lost eye contact and over next few weeks regresses.

   The parent knows it is the vaccines, nothing else happened to the child. The system will deny it is vaccines to it's dying breath, it's a coincidence.   How do you prove it? 

 If the child had had a bad fever or infection before he regressed then I might believe the doctor, but if kid was perfectly healthy, got his vaccines and then regressed, its the vaccines.

    The above scenario plays out thousands of times every year. The doctor is just doing what he was taught to do.  The few 'lucky' parents get compensated with the VICP in the US.

-I believe that many anti-vax sites are approaching this whole issue wrong.  Only about 2% of the population is totally anti-vax, many with a vaccine damaged kid.  So telling 98% of the population that vaccines are dangerous and should be stopped, is not going to work, they will just look at you like your a nut. Because these people see some good vaccines have done and are told over and over how fantastic they are and have never seen 'Chart 1' at top of this blog, and rarely see the bad vaccines do and the media never reports it.

  I think that it is better to use the approach I have in my "Rational Look at Vaccines" post.  Remember that already about 48% of parents have questions about vaccines.  Help educate parents about delaying some vaccines, skipping others, getting them one at a time, quite the one size fits all approach. This gets them thinking.  Once parents understand all this, then it will naturally evolve to where it should be.
    Get rid of mandatory vaccination completely and if someone wants to vaccinate partly, completely, or not at all, that is their choice.  We will not have massive outbreaks any more, we will get a few deaths, but kids will be much healthier.
    I understand people who don't want any vaccines for their kids and think they should have that right. Maybe they are the ones that are correct.  I don't know, I don't have enough accurate information to fully go along with them myself, yet.

There is so much misinformation out there on vaccines. Video's saying vaccines are for de-population or vaccines don't work, make it hard to put forward honest information.

-https://www.nvic.org This is one of the largest and more honest anti-vax sites, can get good stuff here.  This was started by a lady with a vaccine damaged kid. Occasionally I can find slight exaggerations or missing info on site.
-http://www.ageofautism.com I think this is another good site.

There are a number of other good sites that try to stick to the facts.  There is also several really bad sites full of exaggerations and mis-truths.  When you see statements made that do not have supporting links to a reliable source or a scientific study, ignore the site.

-Who is  Andrew Wakefield?  If anyone wants to show how stupid the media is, this is a good topic.  They never get anything correct about Dr. Wakefield.

-https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/jenny-mccarthys-dangerous-views  Here is a typical news story that gets little correct, about Wakefield or Jenny McCarthy.  This article starts of by linking to a totally idiotic site, "Jenny Mcarthy body count" which makes no sense, and then accuses Jenny McCarthy of being the main person behind anti-vax movement. How can that be?  She never even started talking about vaccines until 2007.LOL.  And article also says nonsense about Wakefield.  No one would have ever heard of Wakefield if the media had not made a huge deal out of a tiny case study he did.
-https://globalnews.ca/news/4047765/measles-anti-vaccine-autism-study/  This article about Wakefield is even more silly, it is actually hilarious.  For ex. this article completely misquotes study(see next link).

   Lets look at the facts.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9500320?dopt=Abstract-  This is the infamous study that got Wakefield into so much trouble. Notice there are 12 other doctors signed off on this tiny study. Twelve doctors believed in this study, including Walker Smith, one of the top specialists in the country, that should tell you something.
   After the study was done, the hospital where Wakefield worked held a press conference about the study and Wakefield mentioned verbally that it might be a good idea to stop using the mmr vaccine and go back to the single measles vaccine while they studied this further.(is that being anti-vax?)  That statement ended his life as he knew it.

Note, this study does not say "vaccines cause autism".  This is just a small case study done for some parents who's autistic kids had gastrointestinal problems and this was Wakefield's field of expertise.
  The media often says Wakefield faked data to prove vaccines cause autism.  total nonsense, read the study again, you can't fake data that never existed.  There was no data about the mmr causing autism, only a commentary, as that was what the doctors and patients were wondering.
  Whether Wakefield did some bad things, I don't know, but it is obvious much of the case against him was fabricated by Deer. 

It was the parents that were saying they thought the MMR vaccine might have caused their kids autism and they wanted answers. They found that kids with autism have gastrointestinal issues. This has been noticed for years. Wakefield's retracted study has been proved many times over the past few years.(Google it)

Wakefield's problems started when he said verbally to the media, "he thought the mmr vaccine might be causing this problem and they should switch back to the single measles vaccine while they studied it".
The MMR had recently been patented about 10 years earlier and was making big money for Merck. And GSK just came out with their version of this vaccine around the time of the Wakefield study, another reason they went after him.

A reporter Brian Deer started an investigation and fabricated a story around the facts.  I don't have direct evidence to support this, but people say Deer was hired by Rupert Murdock, the media tycoon, whose son was later put on the GSK board of directors.(See link below for proof of this part)

Deer made a documentary which aired on TV in England. This all happened in England by the way. See his documentary below.

   So it was actually Brian Deer who created the media frenzy over this, not Wakefield. Few would of ever heard of this study if not for Deer.

Everything bad said about Wakefield over the first few years, came from Deer, no one else had anything bad to say about Wakefield from what I can tell.

The complaint to the General Medical Counsel GMC that in the end pulled his license was also filed by Deer, no one else. The GMC bowed to the media.

Now watch the two video's below, they show both sides of the story, which do you believe?

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UbL8opM6TM  This is the documentary made by Deer that was shown to the public and helped discredit Wakefield. Millions saw this video.

 Watch this first and then watch this next video where Wakefield defends himself goes over many of the points raised in Deer's video.(notice comments were disabled for Deer's video, what is he afraid of?)

Also note that Deer accuses Wakefield of trying to make a competing mmr vaccine. Deer's video is the only place you hear this. It was never picked up by the media because they new that was "over the top", and completely untrue.  See video below for the facts on that. The MMR is measles, mumps rubella, these guys were not vaccine makers and did not have the 100's of millions it takes to make a vaccine and there was already 2 versions out there by Merck and GSK.  Do you seriously think they were going to compete with these guys?

Between minutes 11:00 and 14:00 is quite funny as Deer tries to make something out of Wakefield and the hospitals patent applications. First he is making a new mmr vaccine, then he is making capsules, then colostrum,  then gets specialists saying they don't know whats going on.(note that we dont see what he is shoing these doctors)  If they don't know what's going on then how can Wakefield be making a useful mmr vaccine competitor? Because he is not.  it is all very funny as Deer manufactures the narrative he wants. Is Deer just showing these experts nonsense so he can get the puzzled expressions and comments he wants? Deer if very good at what he does.
   IMPORTANT: Note that Deer's video never once shows you the actual patent applications, he blur's them and you only see a few words at a time, never complete sentences. But you do see the patent application # GB2325856 and when you goto Wakefield's video(min 41:15 below), he shows the full patent page with this number and you can actually read it and see he is correct and Deer is wrong, which explains why Deer blurred it. And listen to Wakefields explanation as well.  He is not making a mmr vaccine, but exactly what the abstract of application says.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sh8yjUqzhNs  This is Wakefield defending himself with some supporting facts and documents. Read carefully the patent that shows he was not making a competing mmr vaccine(minute 40:10), and listen to his explanation. See the words "Transfer factor" and the rest, you have to enlarge slightly to read it. This is the most compelling evidence to show that Deer is faking and twisting facts, and Wakefield is correct.

Up to this point in Wakefield's career, you can see he was never against vaccines.

-Note the 12 authors did not suddenly change there mind and retract the paper, that would be weird. I am sure they all felt like running for the hills after seeing what happened to Wakefield.  After years of controversy, 10 of them got together and wrote a letter saying that they stand by the study, but retract some of the comments.

-https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(04)15715-2/fulltext?code=lancet-site  This is the retraction letter.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/944354#%23  This shows there were worries about vaccines and autism long before Wakefield of 1998, this is a 1976 study.  Yet the media keeps saying it is all Wakefield's fault the vaccine autism link, totally untrue as you can see. 

Note: last sentence of this study says "Vaccination is recognized as having a starter function for the onset of autism.

Also minute 37 of above Wakefield video states that just before his study came out there had already been a  public scare about the mmr vaccine causing meningitis.(see next link)  This is true and vaccine was pulled for a couple years until they fixed the vaccine. So public was already worried about the mmr vaccine. Proof in next link. Read 3rd paragraph here.  (So the last thing GSK and Merck wanted was another mmr scare, hence Brian Deer)

-https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/165/6/704/63700  This shows that one of the mmr vaccine was withdrawn in 1992 because it was causing aspect meningitis.Then in 1997 GSK brought in a replacement MMR called Priorix just about when the Wakefield study came out.

Well GSK did not need more MMR vaccine problems, so Wakefield met his end.  (Notice Brian Deer never mentions these MMR problems in his documentary, and Wakefield did.)

So at this point the public would already be wary of the MMR vaccine.  The media today say it was all Wakefields fault that there had been a large drop in measles vaccination around that time, and some big measles outbreaks. This previous mmr scare did a lot to contribute to that.

   Remember it was Deer who was printing all the stories creating the uproar, not Wakefield. Deer is to blame.
    Even if this little study had been faked, why was there such a huge uproar, there are bad and faked studies done all the time. Even Vioxx where Merck faked data, never got this treatment and they killed 10's of thousands.

   I am not saying Wakefield was totally blameless on everything, I just don't know, but I do know he got screwed overall.  Experts can find faults in any study if it is examined closely enough. His little study got examined by everyone, every little think got nit picked.

   By the way, the Wakefield study that showed a link between gastronomical problems and autism and mmr vaccine component there, has since been proved over and over. See this link.

-https://www.bmj.com/rapid-response/2011/11/02/wakefield’s-lancet-paper-vindicated-–-yet-again  and see next link for more.
-http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/10/enduring-memories-prof-john-walker-smith-recalls-his-life-and-the-wakefield-affair.html  Here is some excerpts from Walker Smiths book "enduring Memories"  he wonders "why he is being pursued so viciously". "Who is behind it he wonders". You can buy the book to verify.

--https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/measles-mumps-and-rubella-vaccine-developed-glaxosmithkline-have-immune-response-rates-and-safety  This shows GSK’s  MMR vaccine was first licensed outside the US in 1997, just before the Wakefield incident, no wonder they were in a panic and destroyed Wakefield.

   -Mercks MMR was licensed in 1979. 

--http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-388051/Scientists-fear-MMR-link-autism.html  This 2006 study shows Wakefield study proved correct by US researchers. Says another study done in Dublin in 2001 also proved Wakefield correct, and since 2006 there has been a number of others.
   

IMPORTANT: Read this court decision on Dr. Walker Smith. Remember Walker Smith and Wakefield were the two main authors of study.  The GMC or General Medical Counsel had revoked Walker Smith and Wakefields medical licenses.

-https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/mmr-doctor-john-walker-smith-wins-high-court-appeal-7543114.html This is the court decision when Dr. Walker Smith got his medical license reinstated.  The judge  criticized the disciplinary panel's "inadequate and superficial reasoning and, in a number of instances, a wrong conclusion". 

 The GMC had bowed to media and Industry pressure to remove licenses rather than reason.  This should also all apply to Wakefield, but he could not get coverage to pay for the expensive court case. Note that this article said it took 217 days, one of the longest disciplinary hearing ever.
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Walker-Smith  More on Walker Smith. Says the case against Walker Smith was "superficial and inadequate"

-https://www.businessinsider.com/james-murdoch-is-being-forced-off-the-boards-at-a-bunch-of-huge-companies-2012-3   Rupert Murdocks son was on GSK's board of directors 2009 to 2012 and left in a scandal of phone hacking.
Watson of UK labour party says "Murdock must be the first mafia boss in history who did not know he was running a criminal enterprise."

-http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/discerning-journalist-8-wakefield-myths-deconstructed/#comment-324375   See here for more facts on Wakefield and Deer.

This is one reason why few doctors will do vaccine safety studies now.  They are afraid of getting "Wakefielded".  Also see link 17a for why doctors are afraid.
 
-https://www.vaccinationnews.org/measles-united-kingdom-wakefield-factor  This links shows that the Wakefield study did not cause an increase in measles deaths. The data is here with supporting links at bottom.

-Who is Jenny McCarthy?  While doing this research, I would often see comments on vaccines like, "look at the science don't listen to Jenny McCarthy" JM.  Of course the person making the comment has never looked at any science and has no idea who JM is, their just quoting dogma heard over and over.  All I knew is she talks about vaccines and autism and she did a spread in Playboy.

     So I did what 99% of people do not do. I looked her up, did some research. Starting with Wikipedia, a source I use with caution. The tone of this wiki article is negative to her.

     Wiki says she got $20,000 for playboy and then $100,000 for playmate of the year, this also jump started a paying career in hosting and acting.  I say good for her. I would have done the same in her shoes. If men are stupid enough to pay big money to see some tits, I say go for it.

   I am sure the puritans can't stand it. These are the same people who are happy to bomb innocent civilians in Iraq, yet condemn a person for showing a tit. I say make love, not war.

   Then I watched a few YouTube videos with her and read a few articles, and soon realized most of what I heard about her is nonsense. She is not anti-vax for starters. See this, hear it from her own mouth.

-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kt170kLc29U  She is saying the same as me, we have too many vaccines and not all kids can handle the current schedule, especially the crazy US schedule.  As video said, this is not a black and white issue.  She has a child with autism that she, like many  other parents believe vaccines caused her kids autism.  I am not going to fault her for that.

 Now I read people are saying her kid never had autism, it was something else.   So blame it on the doctors who "misdiagnosed the child" Whatever, she feels the kid was damaged by vaccines, and she was rightfully upset about it.

She has her own radio talk show now and talks about a variety of topics, not sure if she talks about vaccines at all. Some of her shows are on YouTube.

    She is obviously a bright articulate person. You can't be dumb and run your own talk show.  You have to be quick and on the ball to handle everything people say while live on air.

 I admire her courage for putting up with all the crap she got for going public about vaccines and autism. She said what she believed in even though it damaged her career.

 After researching her, I must say, I like her, and believe she has got a raw deal from the corporate sponsored media who's biggest advertisers are pharma and the sheep that follow their lead.

H.  MISCELLANEOUS LINKS

-https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/resource-library/index.html This shows vaccine schedules for past years, when new vaccines were added.

-https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586808001896  ADEM caused by and mmr and some other vaccines. 

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20193633  Vaccines and autoimmune diseases in adults.

-http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0008382  Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the hosts immune system by repeated immunization.

-http://n.neurology.org/content/68/16_suppl_2/S23  ADEM is usually precipitated by a viral infection or vaccination.

-http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0961203311429316  Autoimmunity caused by vaccines.

-http://icandecide.org/white-papers/VaccineSafety-Version-1.0-October-2-2017.pdf Read this white paper on terrible vaccine safety and testing, ever fact is referenced to government sources.

-https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WuCxYpIwQJFjh1fzwLXgf6krtOEESFUQ 
Has both English and Italian report.
Italy army report on vaccines and adverse events. Starts page 117. read page 143, says multiple vaccines could be a problem, and should do individulized assessment.(everyone is different). Says should not give more than 5 monovalent vaccines at one time(these are full grown men, not 15lb infants. Page 144, says a man should not get more than 5 vaccines a in a single solution, like a pentavalent vaccine, or you get side effects. 
The US kids schedule has the 6 month old infant getting 5 vaccines.

Page 119 express concern about side effects and next paragraph about all the aluminum, and concerned about autoimmune diseases.  Page 127 and on shows the list of adverse events.

Read first paragraph of page 142, says particular vaccination practices can lead to arthritis, lupus and another 6 serious problems, this page has more vaccine problems, nhl.

-http://nordic.cochrane.org/news/complaint-filed-european-medicines-agency-over-maladministration-related-safety-hpv-vaccines  Link below comes from here. read rest of the links here.

http://nordic.cochrane.org/sites/nordic.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/nordic_cochrane_views_on_the_ombudsmans_decision_2_nov_2017.pdf  This is the 2017 cochrane report on the EMA European Medicines Agency was hiding safety data on the HPV vaccine. and the european Ombudsman supporting the EMA. 

-http://nordic.cochrane.org/sites/nordic.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/-_our_letter_to_the_ombudsman_13_july_2017.pdf  This link talks about the Nature magazine trash article.(word search “letterhead” Cochran report also mentions how Japan uptake of HPV went from 80% to 1% and Denmark went from 74% to 31%, And in the US they want to make it mandatory, like Texas just did.

    This is a long damming report. The EMA director had a number of drug company patents.

Page 19 says they use a different type of aluminum in the HPV vaccine.

http://nordic.cochrane.org/sites/nordic.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/complaint-to-ema-over-ema.pdf  See bottom page 11 of this, says the same thing that happened to Vioxx is happening to HPV, same coverup. and next page says all studies are from the industry. Read page 12 “Are the Vaccines Safe” Wow scary. how they switched from a saline placebo to a aluminum placebo to hide bad side effects. Also shows how they hid the data like for Vioxx.

  UK Alzheimers society is funded by Eli lilly(page 15)

FDA is also accused of being completely corrupt.

HPV vaccine has made 25 Billion Euro’s so far(page 5)

Get page numbers of where they say are hiding adverse events and what they were.

http://nordic.cochrane.org/sites/nordic.cochrane.org/files/public/uploads/complaint-to-ombudsman-over-ema_101016.pdf  Page 53 says FDA is corrupt and untrustworthy and Vioxx killed 120,000 people.  FDA commissioner who approved Vioxx then went to work for Merck, after $90,000 fine.

page 54 shows another example of how crooked the EMA is uses flu shot and narcolepsy in europe and how it covers it up.  Also says a culture has been established of where you cannot critize vaccines(page 54)

-https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i2412.full  EMA puts industry before patients.

-https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-017-0004-x  Here is Nature magazine defending the EMA Sounds like a Merck HPV commercial. Notice article only mentions DR Blinth, Nature article does not mention that there is 5 top doctors including 2 Cochrane report directors had signed the complaint against the EMA. 

-https://ecf.cofc.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2013vv0611-73-0  This is court case verdict.  Courts says Infants vaccines contributed to kid dying of SIDS. read conclusion at end. 

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344667/ Aluminum and thimerosal in early life and developmental vulnerability.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28882443  This talks about how dangerous it is for a scientist to publish anything negative about vaccines.

-https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-vaccines-can-drive-pathogens-to-evolve-20180510/  Says vaccine maybe causing some diseases to evolve and become more dangerous.  Especially some of the new vaccines for malaria, HIV and anthrax "are designed such that they could encourage these pathogens to become more dangerous."

-http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198  Says some vaccines could drive the evolution of more virulent pathogens.
This is already happening with the pnumonoccal vaccine see Links 94 and 95.

-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10221850  Can vaccination cause type one diabetes? Is there a link this wonders?

-https://wellnessandequality.com/2016/06/20/how-much-money-do-pediatricians-really-make-from-vaccines/ This shows why paediatricians do not want parents who do not vaccinate in their practice.  And shows how much money they make in the US for vaccinated all their kids.

-https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm488978.htm This 2018 article from the FDA, shows that getting a 3rd dose of the mumps vaccine only lasts a few months and should not be recommended.  Also says the mumps vaccine has mostly worn off by college years. So to those who are pushing a 3rd dose of mmr vaccine on us, this says there is no point, won't work. They are trying to find a better vaccine.
    Then this talks a bit about the poor pertussis vaccine. 5th paragraph under whooping cough section Says those vaccinated may not get symptoms of disease but can still get infected and infect others including infants.

-